Cyclophosphamide and Fludarabine Conditioning Chemotherapy Induces a Key Homeostatic Cytokine Profile in Patients Prior to CAR T Cell Therapy

Abstract

This study is supported in part by funding from the Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) between the National Cancer Institute and Kite Pharma Introduction: CAR-engineered autologous T-cell therapy has shown promising activity in relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies in an ongoing phase 1 study (Kochenderfer et al. J Clin Oncol 2014). Lymphodepleting conditioning chemotherapy is critical for optimal CAR T-cell activity in animal models. We evaluated the effects of conditioning chemotherapy on cytokine and chemokine levels in patients dosed with anti-CD19 CAR T cells. Methods: In this National Cancer Institute clinical trial (NCT00924326), patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies received conditioning with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine daily for 3 days starting on day -5; followed by anti-CD19 CAR T cells engineered with a CAR comprising CD28 and CD3-zeta signaling domains. Forty one cytokines, chemokines and immune response related markers were measured in the blood of patients pre (day -5) and post conditioning (day 0) by using EMD Millipore Luminex® xMAP® multiplex assays. Data acquisition and analysis were performed using a Luminex 200™ instrument and xPONENT® 3.1 data analysis software. Increases in cytokine and chemokine levels were analyzed pre- and post- conditioning, and the fold-changes in cytokine and chemokine levels were analyzed relative to clinical outcome subsequent to infusion with anti-CD19 CAR T cells. Analyses were performed with the Wilcoxon rank sum test adjusted for multiplicity with a Bonferroni correction, using a nominal level of 0.006 for significance. Results: Samples from 15patients have been evaluated. There were significant increases pre- to post-conditioning in the levels of interleukin 15 (IL-15; p=0.001), interleukin 7 (IL-7; p=0.0002), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1; p<0.0025) in blood, five days after the initiation of conditioning chemotherapy. Levels of interferon-gamma induced protein 10 (IP-10) were elevated post-conditioning, but did not meet the threshold for significance (p=0.048). Compared with baseline, levels of IL-15 increased on average 13 fold and levels of IL-7, IP-10 and MCP-1, about 2 fold. Comparison of the fold-increases in IL-15 upon conditioning between responders and non-responders approached significance (p=0.01), but did not meet the threshold after multiplicity adjustment. Larger fold-change increases for responders versus non-responders were also observed with placental growth factor (PLGF) (median fold increase 2.6 v. 1.6, average fold increase 32 v 4.2), C-reactive protein (CRP) (median fold increase 3.5 v 2.4, average fold increase 6.6 v. 2.0), IP-10 (median fold increase 2.1 v. 0.7, average fold increase 2.6 v. 2.8), and interleukin 10 (IL-10) (median fold increase 1.8 v. 0.4, average fold increase 3.1 v. 2.0), but did not meet the threshold for significance. In addition to ongoing analysis of conditioning-mediated cytokine induction and clinical response, we are evaluating the impact of conditioning chemotherapy dose on cytokine levels, as well as the relationship between conditioning-related cytokines and CAR T-cell expansion and persistence. Conclusions: The data obtained to date support the hypothesis that cytokines such as IL-15 play a key role in the clinical outcomes to anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. Our results demonstrate that conditioning chemotherapy significantly increases the levels of homeostatic cytokines known to regulate T-cell expansion, as well as specific pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Optimization of conditioning chemotherapy is critical to the activity of CAR T-cell therapies. Disclosures Bot: Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rossi:Amgen: Equity Ownership; Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jiang:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Navale:Amgen: Equity Ownership; Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shen:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sherman:Amgen: Equity Ownership; Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mardiros:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yoder:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Go:Amgen: Equity Ownership; Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rosenberg:Kite Pharma: Other: CRADA between Surgery Branch-NCI and Kite Pharma. Wiezorek:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Officer of Kite Pharma. Chang:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Officer of Kite Pharma. Roberts:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Officer of Kite Pharma.

CAR T-cell therapy for B-cell lymphomas: clinical trial results of available products

“…These cytokines rise a few days after lymphodepleting chemotherapy (especially when fludarabine and cyclophosphamide are used). 63,66 There are other cytokines that appear to mediate the cytotoxic effect of T cells such as IL-6, IL-10 and granzyme B. 66…”

Prolonged Persistence of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell in Adoptive Cancer Immunotherapy: Challenges and Ways Forward

“…In the clinical oncology, during the "countdown period, " usually few days before the CAR T cell therapy, a lymphodepleting conditioning regimen is administered. Lymphodepleting conditioning regimens, comprising IL-2, cyclophosphamide, and fludarabine, are most often used before CAR T cells infusion, allowing for bigger T cell expansion and survival (62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68). During this period, lymphodepleting regimen eradicates homeostatic cytokine sinks, such as IL-7, IL-2, and IL-15, eliminates unwanted immunosuppressive cells, such as regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells and downregulates indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) in tumor cells (67,69).…”

Biomarkers in individualized management of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy

“…Notably, in biomarker discovery approaches, the fact that CAR-T are cell products rather than chemical compounds needs to be taken into consideration. CAR-T cells, upon binding to the appropriate antigen, they initiate a cascade of inflammatory reactions in vivo, hence intrinsic characteristic of CAR-T cells, such as the levels of CD3 and CD8 expression, could serve as potential biomarkers (Table 2) [28,[58][59][60]. The relationship between the peak levels of CAR T-cells and CRS severity remains controversial, likely emanating from the fact that macrophages and not activated T cells seem to be the key mediators of CRS [37,38].…”