2000
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<0377:ctidsa>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclone Tracking in Different Spatial and Temporal Resolutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
129
2
9

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
129
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In exceptional cases, it was found that up to three adjacent gridpoints recorded the same geopotential minimum value at a given time-level. For such cases, the stencil was enlarged and the algebraic average of the longitudinal and latitudinal coordinates of the gridpoints sharing the geopotential minimum value was taken as the position of the closed low at timelevel t (Lambert, 1988;Blender and Schubert, 2000). (B) The tracking of closed lows in time is carried out in an iterative procedure where all the height minima identified at time-level t are subjected to the tracking criteria that entail the following: (a) For each height minimum identified at time-level t, all height minima at time-level t + 1, which are located within a radius of 700 km from a timelevel t height minimum, are considered for the track associated with the time-level t height minimum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In exceptional cases, it was found that up to three adjacent gridpoints recorded the same geopotential minimum value at a given time-level. For such cases, the stencil was enlarged and the algebraic average of the longitudinal and latitudinal coordinates of the gridpoints sharing the geopotential minimum value was taken as the position of the closed low at timelevel t (Lambert, 1988;Blender and Schubert, 2000). (B) The tracking of closed lows in time is carried out in an iterative procedure where all the height minima identified at time-level t are subjected to the tracking criteria that entail the following: (a) For each height minimum identified at time-level t, all height minima at time-level t + 1, which are located within a radius of 700 km from a timelevel t height minimum, are considered for the track associated with the time-level t height minimum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blender and Schubert, 2000;Sickmoller et al, 2000;Geng and Sugi, 2001;Hanson et al, 2004). This can work satisfactorily for a small number of large, wellspaced features, but would be an unequivocal failure if used here, due to the wide range and large number of features identified, some of which move very rapidly (e.g.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These amount to even larger shortfalls compared to the synoptic charts. Whilst analysis period inconsistencies will have had an impact, the primary causes of the shortfalls are likely to be lower spatial resolution of input data (see Blender and Schubert, 2000), simpler identification methodologies, and different thresholding methods. In particular this comparison reiterates the limitations of using surface pressure minima (or equivalently 1000 hPa heights) in isolation, even at higher resolution, as Hoskins and Hodges and others have recognized.…”
Section: Synoptic Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In exemplary form, three strategies will be briefly described. The approach of Blender and Schubert (2008) identifies minima of the 1000 hPa geopotential field (z1000) within a neighbourhood of 8 grid points of a reference point. In order to be able to include very weakly developed centers, a minimum gradient (20 gpm per 1000 km) in a given area (radius 1000 km) is required.…”
Section: -Regional Climate Projections (Christensen Et Al 2007)mentioning
confidence: 99%