2021
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c13401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cycloadditions of Cyclopentadiene and Cycloheptatriene with Tropones: All Endo-[6+4] Cycloadditions Are Ambimodal

Abstract: The cycloadditions of cyclopentadiene and cycloheptatriene with tropone are some of the earliest published examples of [6+4] cycloaddition reactions. We report quantum mechanical studies (ωB97X-D and DLPNO-CCSD(T)) of transition structures and products of these reactions, as well as quasi-classical molecular dynamics simulations of reaction trajectories. The study reveals that these cycloadditions involve ambimodal transition states resulting in a web of products by pericyclic interconversion pathways. Combine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all these cases, the rmcf.py program does not predict any propensity for formation of the bond leading to product C in line with MD carried out by Houk and coworkers, which yielded 1% of 59C , 1% of 60C and 0% of 61C . 65 Hence, we treated these reactions as bifurcations, obtaining ratios of 39% : 61% ( vs. Houk's MD ratio of 36% : 58% for 59A : 59B ), 42% : 58% ( vs. 63% : 30% for 60A : 60B ) and 36% : 64% ( vs. 55% : 37% for 61A : 61B ). The origin of the discrepancies for 60 and 61 is unclear but it is likely is a consequence of steric interactions, as the authors mention in the original work, and which would be consistent with the erroneous prediction of the major product in reaction 5 (see the section Advantages and limitations of RMCF).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In all these cases, the rmcf.py program does not predict any propensity for formation of the bond leading to product C in line with MD carried out by Houk and coworkers, which yielded 1% of 59C , 1% of 60C and 0% of 61C . 65 Hence, we treated these reactions as bifurcations, obtaining ratios of 39% : 61% ( vs. Houk's MD ratio of 36% : 58% for 59A : 59B ), 42% : 58% ( vs. 63% : 30% for 60A : 60B ) and 36% : 64% ( vs. 55% : 37% for 61A : 61B ). The origin of the discrepancies for 60 and 61 is unclear but it is likely is a consequence of steric interactions, as the authors mention in the original work, and which would be consistent with the erroneous prediction of the major product in reaction 5 (see the section Advantages and limitations of RMCF).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, reactions 1-48 served as a training set for the model. Next, we proceed to evaluate its performance on a test set of 13 additional reactions, 49-61, 64,65,66,67,68,69,70 shown in Figure 5. is carried out according to the description in Scheme 2.…”
Section: Comparison Of Rmcf With Existing Approaches Designed For Product Ratio Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An attractive and exciting area of research is to modulate the ambimodal tetrapericyclic transition structure that enables access to complex ring systems which are difficult to obtain by other means. [22]…”
Section: Ambimodal 6 + 4/4 + 6 Cycloadditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When medium- to non-polar solvents were used, the reaction proceeded to give the desired [6+4] cycloadduct ( 3a ) (entries 1–4). While several [6+4] cycloadditions of pentafulvene have been reported, 12 visible-light-induced cycloadditions have not yet been examined. EtOAc seems to be the most effective solvent and furnished 3a in 64% (entry 5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%