1997
DOI: 10.1101/gad.11.11.1479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclin E-induced S phase without activation of the pRb/E2F pathway.

Abstract: In cells of higher eukaryotes, cyclin D-dependent kinases Cdk4 and Cdk6 and, possibly, cyclin E-dependentCdk2 positively regulate the G 1-to S-phase transition, by phosphorylating the retinoblastoma protein (pRb), thereby releasing E2F transcription factors that control S-phase genes. Here we performed microinjection and transfection experiments using rat R12 fibroblasts, their derivatives conditionally overexpressing cyclins D1 or E, and human U-2-OS cells, to explore the action of G~ cyclins and the relation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

27
322
3
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 369 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
27
322
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, E2F is not su cient to prevent growth inhibition by p27, implying that cyclin E/CDK2 complexes have an additional role(s) at the G1-S transition, distinct from pRb phosphorylation (Alevizopoulos et al, 1997;Mann and Jones, 1996). Similar conclusions were reached by other groups (Chew et al, 1998;Hofmann and Livingston, 1996;Knudsen et al, 1998;Leng et al, 1997;Lukas et al, 1997;Ohtsubo et al, 1995;Resnitzky and Reed, 1995). In summary, the ability of the CDK4 inhibitor p16 to arrest the cell cycle in G1 seems to depend essentially on activation of pRb and sequestration of E2F, whereas p27 not only activates pRb, but also impinges on other CDK2-regulated events (discussed in Dyson, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, E2F is not su cient to prevent growth inhibition by p27, implying that cyclin E/CDK2 complexes have an additional role(s) at the G1-S transition, distinct from pRb phosphorylation (Alevizopoulos et al, 1997;Mann and Jones, 1996). Similar conclusions were reached by other groups (Chew et al, 1998;Hofmann and Livingston, 1996;Knudsen et al, 1998;Leng et al, 1997;Lukas et al, 1997;Ohtsubo et al, 1995;Resnitzky and Reed, 1995). In summary, the ability of the CDK4 inhibitor p16 to arrest the cell cycle in G1 seems to depend essentially on activation of pRb and sequestration of E2F, whereas p27 not only activates pRb, but also impinges on other CDK2-regulated events (discussed in Dyson, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Alternatively, a modulation of RB binding to cyclin D has not been considered and the stimulation of type 1 phosphatase dephosphorylates RB at mitosis but is not instrumental in cell cycle arrest induced by serum starvation [39]. Finally, an independent regulation through cAMP of downstream G1 events, such as cyclin E-CDK2 activity [11], is not formally excluded by the present experiments. Therefore, though subtle modifications of cyclin D3 or CDK4 conformation or localization may have escaped our analysis, the present results indicate that a key labile event(s) responsible for the last control of the activity of assembled cyclin D-CDK4 complexes and/or RB phosphorylation at restriction point remains to be uncovered, in dog thyrocytes stimulated through cAMP elevation, and possibly in other systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Cyclin D expression appears to be responsive to mitogenic stimuli and therefore gain-of-function mutations, including gene amplification, may represent a bypass of various receptor/ligand-dependent mitogenic stimuli. Cyclin E functions downstream of cyclin D and appears to contribute to entry into S-phase both through the hyperphosphorylation of Rb and by Rb-independent mechanisms (Lukas et al, 1997;Seghezzi et al, 1998;Geisen and Moroy, 2002;Wei et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%