1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0163-7258(98)00062-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclin-Dependent KinasesInitial Approaches to Exploit a Novel Therapeutic Target

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compounds much more selective for CDK inhibition versus other kinases include flavopiridol that inhibits all CDKs, however, buty-rolactone I, olomucine and roscovitine, purvanolol and paullone derivatives are relatively selective for CDK1(CDC2) and CDK2, but spare CDK4 and CDK6. The antiproliferative effects of these compounds on the growth of several human cell lines has been well documented (Sausville et al, 1999;Meijer et al, 1999). The effects in vivo of these compounds paralleled the in vitro efficiency and were further confirmed with the use of dominant negatives, the overexpression of natural CKIs and the microinjection of inactivating antibodies or antisense technologies (van den Heuvel and Harlow, 1993).…”
Section: Chemical Inhibitors Of Cdkmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Compounds much more selective for CDK inhibition versus other kinases include flavopiridol that inhibits all CDKs, however, buty-rolactone I, olomucine and roscovitine, purvanolol and paullone derivatives are relatively selective for CDK1(CDC2) and CDK2, but spare CDK4 and CDK6. The antiproliferative effects of these compounds on the growth of several human cell lines has been well documented (Sausville et al, 1999;Meijer et al, 1999). The effects in vivo of these compounds paralleled the in vitro efficiency and were further confirmed with the use of dominant negatives, the overexpression of natural CKIs and the microinjection of inactivating antibodies or antisense technologies (van den Heuvel and Harlow, 1993).…”
Section: Chemical Inhibitors Of Cdkmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As predicted, the preliminary results of experimental studies in our laboratory indicate that breast cancer cell lines with PTEN mutations are extraordinarily sensitive to rapamycin (Hidalgo M, personal communication). In addition to increased sensitivity to rapamycin conferred by mutations of the PTEN suppressor oncogene, abnormalities of regulators of the G 1 checkpoint such as pRB, p16, p27, and cyclin D1 may also increase the sensitivity of tumors to rapamycin and may predict for drug e cacy (Sausville et al, 1999). It is clear that de®ning the molecular characteristics of tumors of patients enrolled in clinical trials of CCI-779 may help to identify which patients may bene®t from treatment.…”
Section: Clinical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This does not exclude the possibility that abnormalities in G 1 checkpoint regulators known to occur in ES cells (Deneen and Denny, 2001) may also contribute to, and most likely increase their sensitivity to rapamycin. In this regard, the presence in ES cells of altered pRB, p16, p27 or cyclin D1 may be predictors of enhanced rapamycin efficacy (Sausville et al, 1999). As EWS/FLI-1 is the main determinant of the malignancy of ES tumors (Arvand and Denny, 2001), rapamycin treatment may have a dual effect as a cytostatic agent and suppressor of the neoplastic phenotype of ES cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%