2016
DOI: 10.15273/allons-y.v1i1.10048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclical Youth-Led Conflict as an Early Warning Indicator

Abstract: The dynamics of conflict are shifting. In the 2011 World Development Report, the World Bank stated that conflicts are now increasingly cyclical and intractable events; 90 percent of the civil wars that occurred in the 2000s were fought within countries that had experienced a domestic conflict in the past 30 years (World Bank, 2011). Countries are more likely to experience cycles of violence due to the persistence of weak state structures that cannot extend their reach into peripheral regions, leading to local … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This limitation, nevertheless, only affects specific applications of AP2 and has no bearing on IHL in general. Therefore, the dependence on the definition of an armed organisation and the presence of a violent dispute unites these explanations of the computerised recruitment procedure that is humanitarian and legal and the use of minors (Legassicke et al, 2023). Therefore, except for recruitment and utilisation by state military personnel, both prohibit the use of children in aggression that is not related to an armed conflict.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limitation, nevertheless, only affects specific applications of AP2 and has no bearing on IHL in general. Therefore, the dependence on the definition of an armed organisation and the presence of a violent dispute unites these explanations of the computerised recruitment procedure that is humanitarian and legal and the use of minors (Legassicke et al, 2023). Therefore, except for recruitment and utilisation by state military personnel, both prohibit the use of children in aggression that is not related to an armed conflict.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%