1977
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0728(77)80480-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic voltammetry of iron dimine complexes in acetonitrile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complex 17 shows also a quasi‐reversible process [iron(II)/iron(III)] at 0.72 V (reduction potential) and 0.83 V (oxidation potential), in good agreement with the values reported in literature (1.07 V vs. Ag/AgCl in 0.2 m NEt 4 ClO 4 /MeCN). Please note the strong impact of the used chelate ligand on the redox potentials.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Complex 17 shows also a quasi‐reversible process [iron(II)/iron(III)] at 0.72 V (reduction potential) and 0.83 V (oxidation potential), in good agreement with the values reported in literature (1.07 V vs. Ag/AgCl in 0.2 m NEt 4 ClO 4 /MeCN). Please note the strong impact of the used chelate ligand on the redox potentials.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Indeed, these values are expected to be smaller when taking into the account the experimental boundaries of the EW of MeCN (i. e., 3.59 and 3.68 V) or MeCN doped with ionic liquids (i. e., 5.09 and 6.14 V), but still significantly larger than those of all existing commercially employed aqueous RFBs. By comparing these values with previously reported non‐aqueous systems it is evident that they are higher than those that are promising for the use in RFBs, such as M‐acacs: 1.75 V in Ru(acac) 3 , [111] 2.20 V in V(acac) 3 , [68] 3.40 V in Cr(acac) 3 , [112] or pyridyl‐containing complexes within the +3⇄−1 range, previously reported for these systems: 2.71 V Fe(bpy) 3 [113] and 3.14 V in Fe(tpy) 2 [114] . It should be noted that while these two designed complexes do exhibit multiple redox events and high OCV values, before they are employed as charge carriers in commercial RFBs, further studies of compound solubility, transport kinetics across the charge states, reversibility, and other parameters should also be considered.…”
Section: Computational Efforts To Improve Performance Of Rfbsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Since complex II has two pyridyl moieties, one should compare it to the previously reported redox potentials of the M(bpy) 3 and M(tpy) 2 complexes (M=Fe, Ru) (vs. Fc 0 /Fc + ) in the +3 → −1 charge states [76]. Within this range, the OCV value of complex II (4.74 V) is also higher than those of Fe(bpy) 3 (2.71 V [77,78] and 2.80 V [76]), Ru(bpy) 3 (2.88 V) [79,80], Fe(tpy) 2 (3.14 V) [76], and Ru(tpy) 2 (3.24 V) [81][82][83]. Indeed, the expansion of the EW by ILs could further increase the OCV values of all complexes.…”
Section: Reduction Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 87%