1971
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pp.22.060171.001255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic Variations in Stomatal Aperture, Transpiration, and Leaf Water Potential Under Constant Environmental Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
104
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
104
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2, 5, 6, 8) but these peaks did not appear consistently and did not represent a consistent period when they did appear. Because of this inconsistency, interpretation of the short-period MESA peaks is difficult, but it is possible that they may relate to reported short-period stomatal oscillations in whole leaves (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, 5, 6, 8) but these peaks did not appear consistently and did not represent a consistent period when they did appear. Because of this inconsistency, interpretation of the short-period MESA peaks is difficult, but it is possible that they may relate to reported short-period stomatal oscillations in whole leaves (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cyclic stomatal behaviour has been observed in many species, including cotton, pepper and sunflower (Barrs & Klepper, 1968), citrus trees (Levy & Kaufmann, 1976), rose bushes (Rose & Rose, 1994) and grapevines (Düring, 2000;Düring & Stoll, 1996). These oscillations can be the result of instability in either a CO 2 control system or a water control system, or a combination thereof (Barrs, 1971). The period of oscillation can vary from less than one minute to more than an hour.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The period of oscillation can vary from less than one minute to more than an hour. Shallow, shorter oscillation periods are generally associated with control of CO2 status, whereas deeper, longer periods are associated with water status control (Barrs, 1971 and references therein). The generally accepted explanation is the following: as stomata open in the light, transpiration increases, leaf water content falls, and the associated water deficit causes partial stomatal closure, leaves regain turgor upon water inflow in response to the steepened water potential gradient, and finally Ψl rises again, permitting stomata to re-open, thus re-commencing the cycle (Barrs & Klepper, 1968).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
ABSTRACTIt is supposed that oscillations in stomatal conductance are associated with the dynamic properties of the loop in which rate of evaporation affects, through physiological processes, Self-sustained oscillations, having a period of about 40 min, in stomatal aperture, and plant functioning associated with stomatal aperture, are known to occur in many plant species (1,3). Several models of the mechanism responsible for these oscillations have been described (3, 7-9, 1 1).
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-sustained oscillations, having a period of about 40 min, in stomatal aperture, and plant functioning associated with stomatal aperture, are known to occur in many plant species (1,3). Several models of the mechanism responsible for these oscillations have been described (3, 7-9, 1 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%