2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic tests of a precast restrained rocking system for sustainable and resilient seismic design of bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a rocking mechanism limits the design loads and moments on both the structure and the foundation, offering great optimization potential. The effectiveness of rocking as an earthquake hazard mitigation strategy has been explored for various classes of structures, including rigid blocks, [ 1–8 ] columns of ancient temples [ 9–18 ] rocking frames, [ 19–27 ] rocking bridges [ 28–36 ] and rocking buildings. [ 36–44 ] Makris and Vassiliou [ 19,20 ] showed that the response of a rocking frame is equivalent to the response of a rigid free‐standing solitary column with the same slenderness as the column of the frame, but of a larger size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a rocking mechanism limits the design loads and moments on both the structure and the foundation, offering great optimization potential. The effectiveness of rocking as an earthquake hazard mitigation strategy has been explored for various classes of structures, including rigid blocks, [ 1–8 ] columns of ancient temples [ 9–18 ] rocking frames, [ 19–27 ] rocking bridges [ 28–36 ] and rocking buildings. [ 36–44 ] Makris and Vassiliou [ 19,20 ] showed that the response of a rocking frame is equivalent to the response of a rigid free‐standing solitary column with the same slenderness as the column of the frame, but of a larger size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of rocking as an earthquake hazard mitigation strategy has been explored for various classes of structures, including rigid blocks, [ 1–8 ] columns of ancient temples [ 9–18 ] rocking frames, [ 19–27 ] rocking bridges [ 28–36 ] and rocking buildings. [ 36–44 ] Makris and Vassiliou [ 19,20 ] showed that the response of a rocking frame is equivalent to the response of a rigid free‐standing solitary column with the same slenderness as the column of the frame, but of a larger size. For this reason, the rocking oscillator can be used to describe the dynamic response of a wide range of rocking isolated structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last half century, rocking has been extensively studied and it was proposed as an alternative seismic design method 1–14 . Rocking isolation is a resilient design alternative that has the potential of reducing the cost of conventionally designed bridges: it reduces the forces transmitted to the foundation and it can present low‐damage even after being subjected to design level events, provided that adequate detailing of the columns ends is employed 15–17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prestressing the restrainers would also change the uplifting force (Figure 1B). 15–32 A more stable system can also be achieved without changing the uplifting force by extending the block ends in a curved shape (Figure 1C) 33,34 or by adding damping or inerter devices 35–39 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rocking oscillator is the one that can uplift from its base when subjected to sufficiently strong ground motion excitation (Figure 1). It is worth studying because it can describe a plethora of structures: First, since uplift works as a mechanical fuse, rocking can be used as a seismic design strategy for both bridges 1–24 and buildings 23,25–33 . Second, the out‐of‐plane response of masonry walls is a form of rocking motion 34–47 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%