2017
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2017.00073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic Tensile Strain Can Play a Role in Directing both Intramembranous and Endochondral Ossification of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Abstract: Successfully regenerating damaged or diseased bone and other joint tissues will require a detailed understanding of how joint specific environmental cues regulate the fate of progenitor cells that are recruited or delivered to the site of injury. The goal of this study was to explore the role of cyclic tensile strain (CTS) in regulating the initiation of mesenchymal stem cell/multipotent stromal cell (MSC) differentiation, and specifically their progression along the endochondral pathway. To this end, we first… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(86 reference statements)
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above inconsistent findings from vibration studies may be due to different vibration parameters (e.g., frequency, magnitude) and experimental design (e.g., treatment time, culture condition). Moreover, other types of mechanical stimuli, such as stretch/tensile strain [ 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 ], pressure/compressive stress [ 104 , 105 ], and shear stress [ 106 , 107 ], have also been studied in regulating MSCs differentiation and most show proosteoblastic and antiadipocytic differentiation roles. Although there are few contrary results, the above findings demonstrate that the mechanical loading promotes osteoblast differentiation and suppresses adipocyte differentiation of MSCs and may through activating ERK1/2, p38 MAPK signaling [ 92 , 99 , 101 , 103 , 104 ], or others.…”
Section: The Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Osteoblast and Adipocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above inconsistent findings from vibration studies may be due to different vibration parameters (e.g., frequency, magnitude) and experimental design (e.g., treatment time, culture condition). Moreover, other types of mechanical stimuli, such as stretch/tensile strain [ 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 ], pressure/compressive stress [ 104 , 105 ], and shear stress [ 106 , 107 ], have also been studied in regulating MSCs differentiation and most show proosteoblastic and antiadipocytic differentiation roles. Although there are few contrary results, the above findings demonstrate that the mechanical loading promotes osteoblast differentiation and suppresses adipocyte differentiation of MSCs and may through activating ERK1/2, p38 MAPK signaling [ 92 , 99 , 101 , 103 , 104 ], or others.…”
Section: The Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Osteoblast and Adipocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, bioreactors have been designed to spatially control biomechanical and physical signals to guide cell proliferation, differentiation and, ultimately, tissue formation [194][195][196][197][198], with the application of uniaxial tensile loads and dynamic compressive loading to emulate tendon and bone mechanophysiology, respectively. Using this concept, MSCs have been differentiated in several scaffolds under the influence of different biomechanical stimuli provided in bioreactors [199][200][201][202]. Several strategies have focused on the use of diffusingbased bioreactors to co-differentiate cells along a unique platform creating an interface [197,203,204], but, no studies are still available with the use of these dynamic plataforms Finer spatial control should also be focused to enhance knowledge on the effect of several chemical stimulus and, therefore, improving local cellular modulation and control.…”
Section: Static or Dynamic? The Role Of Mechanical Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scleraxis was quickly upregulated being significantly more highly expressed after 24 h over unloaded controls, while tenascin, collagen I and collagen III were all significantly increased after 48 h, data which are supported by several other studies in response to 5% tensile strain. 22,56 We used conventional histological techniques to determine changes in cell alignment and protein production. H&E staining revealed that the tissue-engineered tendon cultured with dynamic 5% strain had a more visibly pronounced alignment and a greater abundance of cells and matrix at the surface than controls, supporting findings from previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%