Volume 7: CFD and VIV; Offshore Geotechnics 2011
DOI: 10.1115/omae2011-49391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic Response of Granular Subsoil Under a Gravity Base Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbines

Abstract: It is essential in the design of gravity foundations under cyclic loading that inadmissibly large reductions of the subsoil bearing capacity due to the accumulated pore water pressure (loss of stability) and tilting of the foundation caused by the accumulation of settlements (loss of serviceability) are ruled out. This paper describes a procedure to predict these phenomena in non-cohesive subsoils. Real irregular loads during the service life of the structure can be idealized into parcels of uniform cyclic loa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. 2.23 Fluctuating moment due to wave loads (top), transient caisson motions and transient pore pressures (middle) and residual pore pressure and residual motions (bottom) (Kudella et al (2006)) 3.1 Implicit and explicit steps to be taken in a coupled approach for pore pressure development (Safinus et al (2011) (Finn et al (1983)) . .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…. 2.23 Fluctuating moment due to wave loads (top), transient caisson motions and transient pore pressures (middle) and residual pore pressure and residual motions (bottom) (Kudella et al (2006)) 3.1 Implicit and explicit steps to be taken in a coupled approach for pore pressure development (Safinus et al (2011) (Finn et al (1983)) . .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to take the dependency of soil stiffness versus mean effective stresses into account, however this leads to an expensive procedure of calculations. Finally, according to Safinus et al (2011) the steps in the hybrid models can be separated into implicit and explicit procedures, with the implicit procedures representing the steps in the constitutive model, and the explicit steps the pore pressure development in an empirical model.…”
Section: • Constitutive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the numerical error increases in each modelled load cycle, resulting in a less reliable pore pressure output. Safinus et al (2011) concluded that the number of load cycles in a constitutive model should not exceed 100 to limit the numerical error. For wave loads, this represents only a small part of a storm and therefore a full constitutive model is not suitable to model a large number of load cycles.…”
Section: Challenges In Modelling Eppsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pore pressures may have a significant effect on the stability of an offshore gravity foundation for an offshore wind turbine as well. Currently, the design is often based on the static stability check, while the relation between cyclic loading of the subsoil and the stability of the structure receives less attention (Safinus, Sedlacek, and Hartwig 2011; Det Norske Veritas (DNV) 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%