2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2018.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic performance of reinforced legs in retrofitted transmission towers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To construct a test rig for an actual crossarm, the material should be selected based on the length and width of the existing 132-kV transmission tower. Since the height of a crossarm is roughly 2 to 3 m, the test rig should be designed to have a height of roughly 4 m to replicate the actual condition in a smaller scale [38][39][40]. Figure 2 displays final CAD drawing of cantilever beam creep test rig for crossarm using CATIA V5.…”
Section: Design Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To construct a test rig for an actual crossarm, the material should be selected based on the length and width of the existing 132-kV transmission tower. Since the height of a crossarm is roughly 2 to 3 m, the test rig should be designed to have a height of roughly 4 m to replicate the actual condition in a smaller scale [38][39][40]. Figure 2 displays final CAD drawing of cantilever beam creep test rig for crossarm using CATIA V5.…”
Section: Design Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some papers [5][6][7] address the structural behaviour of retrofitted tower leg members under monotonic and cyclic loading and show that the bolt connector plays a critical role in increasing compressive load capacity, but they are limited to splice connectors, mainly having the cruciform character. Since slippage in the connection between the reinforced and reinforcing members significantly affects the behaviour of the entire strengthened member, these results are not fully representative in the case of the design solution discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trovato et al [25] designed a reinforcement method that prevents lateral torsion and weak axial buckling of single-angle section members through a casing and achieved good results overall. Lu et al [26,27] conducted an experimental and numerical study on the reinforcement method of anisotropic cross-shaped components in the legs of lattice transmission or communication towers, effectively improving the overall strength of the structure. Ananthi et al [28] conducted experimental research on the welding and fastening of back-to-back combination unequal-leg cold-bending steel angles under axial compression, and the results showed that the predicted bearing capacity of unequal leg combination angle steel using the direct strength method was about 7% lower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%