2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10623-021-00920-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic orbit flag codes

Abstract: In network coding, a flag code is a set of sequences of nested subspaces of F n q , being F q the finite field with q elements. Flag codes defined as orbits of a cyclic subgroup of the general linear group acting on flags of F n q are called cyclic orbit flag codes. Inspired by the ideas in [10], we determine the cardinality of a cyclic orbit flag code and provide bounds for its distance with the help of the largest subfield over which all the subspaces of a flag are vector spaces (the best friend of the flag)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Referring to [146] the authors of [142] state that the Singleton bound is always stronger than the sphere packing bound for non-trivial codes. However, for = 2, = 8, = 6, and = 4, the sphere-packing bound gives an upper bound of 200787/451 ≈ 445.20399 while the Singleton bound gives an upper bound of 6 4 2 = 651. For = 2, = 8, = 4, and = 4 it is just the other way round, i.e., the Singleton bound gives 7 3 2 = 11811 and the sphere-packing bound gives 8 4 2 = 200787.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Sphere-packing And The Singleton Boundmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Referring to [146] the authors of [142] state that the Singleton bound is always stronger than the sphere packing bound for non-trivial codes. However, for = 2, = 8, = 6, and = 4, the sphere-packing bound gives an upper bound of 200787/451 ≈ 445.20399 while the Singleton bound gives an upper bound of 6 4 2 = 651. For = 2, = 8, = 4, and = 4 it is just the other way round, i.e., the Singleton bound gives 7 3 2 = 11811 and the sphere-packing bound gives 8 4 2 = 200787.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Sphere-packing And The Singleton Boundmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In e.g. [154] (6,4; 3) = 77 and 2 (8, 6; 4) = 257, which are obtained via extensive ILP computations, see [132] and [119], respectively.…”
Section: Upper Bounds For Constant Dimension Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, in the applications of flags to network coding, spherical buildings are used. Such strategy, first introduced in [23], has found further developments in [4,5,6,22] and variations in [16]. Moreover, Bruhat-Tits buildings also make their appearance in the study of holographic codes [25] as well as in the study of valued rank-metric codes [12].…”
Section: Permutation Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%