Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf02013745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic bone remodeling in deer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hillman et al [20] reported on the resorption rate of various bones in the mule deer during antler formation. The highest rate of bone resorption was seen in the ribs followed by the metacarpus and then the metatarsus, with 23.0%, 13.7%, and 10.3% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hillman et al [20] reported on the resorption rate of various bones in the mule deer during antler formation. The highest rate of bone resorption was seen in the ribs followed by the metacarpus and then the metatarsus, with 23.0%, 13.7%, and 10.3% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because the periosteal (‘velvet’) covering of the antlers had been shed and antler growth was complete, the relatively minor amount of appendicular cortical bone that had been reabsorbed for the demands of antler growth would have been replenished (Banks et al. 1968; Hillman et al. 1973).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the mineral requirements of growing antlers cannot be met by dietary intake, bone resorption occurs in the skeleton of deer to provide the necessary extra amounts of calcium and phosphorus (Meister 1956;Banks et al 1968a, b;Hillman et al 1973;Baxter et al 1999). …”
Section: Antler Growth and Mineralizationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Sawicka-Kapusta (1979) measured high sulfur concentrations in roe deer antlers from the Niepoomice forest and forests in Silesia. In the latter region, mean sulfur concentration in antlers (dry matter) increased by about 29 percent from the period 1938-1950to the period 1951-1973. Sawicka-Kapusta (1979 interpreted this increase as ''reflecting the higher acidification of the forest environment by sulphur dioxide''.…”
Section: Influence Of Pollutants On Antler Qualitymentioning
confidence: 96%