2015
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic Behavior of CLT Wall Systems: Experimental Tests and Analytical Prediction Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
92
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of this research project was to develop seismic resistant sustainable multi-storey timber buildings made of prefabricated cross-laminated panels. Within this project, racking tests of wall panels with different layouts of connections and openings (Ceccotti et al 2006;Gavric et al 2014a) and pseudo-dynamic tests of a full scale one-storey building were performed (Lauriola and Sandhaas 2006). Next, shaking table tests of a three-storey (Ceccotti 2008) and a seven-storey building were carried out in 2006 and 2007, respectively, the latter one being conducted at the world's largest seismic testing facility (E-Defense) in Miki, Japan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this research project was to develop seismic resistant sustainable multi-storey timber buildings made of prefabricated cross-laminated panels. Within this project, racking tests of wall panels with different layouts of connections and openings (Ceccotti et al 2006;Gavric et al 2014a) and pseudo-dynamic tests of a full scale one-storey building were performed (Lauriola and Sandhaas 2006). Next, shaking table tests of a three-storey (Ceccotti 2008) and a seven-storey building were carried out in 2006 and 2007, respectively, the latter one being conducted at the world's largest seismic testing facility (E-Defense) in Miki, Japan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 3 to 6 summarize typical comparisons between predictions obtained with the numerical modelling approach implemented in this study and the experimental results described in previous studies. () To this end, Figure 3 presents the calibration of nonlinear springs to a BMF 90×48x3×116 mm angle bracket and a HTT22 hold‐down connector. Similarly, the numerical and experimental hysteretic force‐displacement relationships and cumulative dissipated energy corresponding to a single‐panel CLT wall tested by Gavric et al under cyclic conditions are presented in Figure 4.…”
Section: Seismic Design and Modelling Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OpenSees Experiment (C) Experimental with the numerical modelling approach implemented in this study and the experimental results described in previous studies. 5,8,9,19,40,41 To this end, Figure 3 Figure 5 depicts the numerical and analytical cyclic responses of Specimen 2.1 in the same study. This wall incorporated a half-lap joint with HBS 8×80 mm self-threaded screws simulated by means of nonlinear vertical springs as depicted in Figure 5A.…”
Section: Dissipated Energy [Kj]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. In den Jahren 2010 und 2011 wurde von denselben Beteiligten eine weitere Versuchsreihe zur Untersuchung der Verbindungsmittel, die im Projekt SOFIE verwendet wurden, durchgeführt .…”
Section: Experimentelle Versucheunclassified