1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-5288(18)32305-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cycle of bovine lymphoblastoid cells parasitised by Theileria parva

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general histone synthesis coincides with DNA synthesis, and an increase in histone expression has been described during S phase in mammalian cells [44]. It was previously shown that T. parva initiates DNA synthesis when the host cell is in mitosis [45], although this has never been tested for T. annulata . We therefore analysed the incorporation of the thymidine analogue 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) into host and parasite nuclei while cells were released from S-phase-block.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general histone synthesis coincides with DNA synthesis, and an increase in histone expression has been described during S phase in mammalian cells [44]. It was previously shown that T. parva initiates DNA synthesis when the host cell is in mitosis [45], although this has never been tested for T. annulata . We therefore analysed the incorporation of the thymidine analogue 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) into host and parasite nuclei while cells were released from S-phase-block.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the S phases of parasite and host are not synchronized, reports regarding synchronicity of parasite and host cell nuclear division are contradictory, with Irvin et al 1982 claiming a synchronization of the parasite nuclear division with host cell metaphase, while Hulliger et al 1964 found no proof for synchronization of the parasite division with any stage of the host cell cycle. With respect to the distribution of the schizont into daughter cells, it has been postulated that this is a random event (Hulliger et al 1964), although, considering that in normal cultures up to 95% of the cells usually harbour the parasite (Dobbelaere and Heussler 1999), a controlled process would appear to be more probable and more suitable for the parasite's purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the leucocyte, the schizont displays deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) synthesis asynchronous to the host cell (Irvin et al 1982). Although the S phases of parasite and host are not synchronized, reports regarding synchronicity of parasite and host cell nuclear division are contradictory, with Irvin et al 1982 claiming a synchronization of the parasite nuclear division with host cell metaphase, while Hulliger et al 1964 found no proof for synchronization of the parasite division with any stage of the host cell cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the transformed cells the parasites undergo nuclear division ahead of the host cell due to a shortened or absent G2 phase. This enables the parasites to grow synchronously with their host cells and ensures the transfer of the parasites into daughter cells (Irvin et al 1982). This transformation, however, is completely reversible, since the infected cells return to a resting phenotype after the elimination of the parasite by the anti-theilerial drug buparvaquone (McHardy 1984;Rintelen et al 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%