1972
DOI: 10.1017/s0021932000008701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cycle day of ovulation

Abstract: The length of the post-ovulatory phase in a composite sample of menstrual cycles increases linearly with cycle length until cycle length reaches about 30 days, but thereafter it ceases to increase (Vollman, 1953; Bailey & Marshall, 1970). By contrast, plotted against the mean cycle length of the individual, the length of the post-ovulatory phase continues to increase roughly linearly with mean cycle length. It is concluded (a) that many long cycles are aberrant occurrences among cycles of normal length and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the method of fertile-phase calculation by the examined apps was not available, methods published in the literature that use calendar information alone were examined. These predictive methods were: the standard days method, which predicts days 8-19 of the cycle as fertile days 25 ; the rhythm method, which predicts fertile days using a formula and is based on data from the menstrual records of the past six cycles (the fertile period is predicted as starting on day [x À 18] and ending on day [y -11], where x is the shortest and y is the longest number of days in a woman's menstrual cycle record) 12,26 ; the alternative rhythm method, which predicts fertile days from menstrual records using a different formula (the fertile days start on day ( 1 = 2 x À 5) and last for (y -x þ 8) days, where x is the shortest and y is the longest number of days in a woman's menstrual cycle record 27 ; and the simple calendar method, which subtracts 14 and 15 days from the last cycle length to give the peak fertility days 22 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the method of fertile-phase calculation by the examined apps was not available, methods published in the literature that use calendar information alone were examined. These predictive methods were: the standard days method, which predicts days 8-19 of the cycle as fertile days 25 ; the rhythm method, which predicts fertile days using a formula and is based on data from the menstrual records of the past six cycles (the fertile period is predicted as starting on day [x À 18] and ending on day [y -11], where x is the shortest and y is the longest number of days in a woman's menstrual cycle record) 12,26 ; the alternative rhythm method, which predicts fertile days from menstrual records using a different formula (the fertile days start on day ( 1 = 2 x À 5) and last for (y -x þ 8) days, where x is the shortest and y is the longest number of days in a woman's menstrual cycle record 27 ; and the simple calendar method, which subtracts 14 and 15 days from the last cycle length to give the peak fertility days 22 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%