Cyberterrorism in the Context of Contemporary International Law

Sirjajev, Jaroslav

doi:10.2139/ssrn.2220296

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For these purposes, States Parties shall in particular take all appropriate national, bilateral and multilateral measures to prevent: The UN Security Council Resolution 1624 requires states to "Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts." (UN Security Council 2005; for analysis of the international law on free speech consequent to this resolution, see Shiryaev 2012;and Ronen 2010) The international law on what forms of speech are required to be be prohibited was summarised by UN Special Rapporteur Frank La Rue (La Rue 2011c, paras 20-36) as:…”

Section: Mandatory Restrictionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internet blocking and shutdowns in India and international human rights law

Prakash

2024

IPPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines the provision for Internet blocking and shutdowns in Indian law, and compares it with international human rights law (IHRL). It finds that IHRL potentially offers a useful lens through which to view these actions; that IHRL is widely accepted by the Indian state, including the judiciary; and that IHRL provides a useful complement to constitutional analysis. It also finds that the Indian laws and practices around Internet shutdowns and online content blocking fall short of IHRL in significant ways, including when it comes to the principles of legality, legitimate aims, necessity, proportionality, transparency, and remedies for violation of rights. Finally, it offers suggestions on how to improve the laws and practices in each of these areas, so as to comply with India’s IHRL obligations.

show abstract

Section: Mandatory Restrictionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internet blocking and shutdowns in India and international human rights law

Prakash

2024

IPPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

How Google Perceives Customer Privacy, Cyber, E-Commerce, Political and Regulatory Compliance Risks

Trautman

2017

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

By now, almost every business has an Internet presence. What are the major risks perceived by those engaged in the universe of Internet businesses? What potential risks, if they become reality, may cause substantial increases in operating costs or threaten the very survival of the enterprise? This Article discusses the relevant annual report disclosures from Alphabet, Inc. (parent of Google), along with other Google documents, as a potentially powerful teaching device. Most of the descriptive language to follow is excerpted directly from Alphabet's (Google) regulatory filings. My additions about these entities include weaving their disclosure materials into a logical presentation and providing supplemental sources for those who desire a deeper look (usually in my footnotes) at any particular aspect. I have sought to present a roadmap with these materials that shows Google's struggle to optimize their business performance while navigating through a complicated maze of regulatory compliance concerns and issues involving governmental jurisdictions throughout the world. International cybercrime and risk issues follow, with an examination of anti-money laundering, counterterrorist, and other potential illegal activity laws. The value proposition offered here is disarmingly simpleat no out-of-pocket cost, the reader has an opportunity to invest probably just a few hours to read and reflect upon the Alphabet,

show abstract

Cyberterrorism in the Context of Contemporary International Law

Cited by 2 publications

References 24 publications

Internet blocking and shutdowns in India and international human rights law

Internet blocking and shutdowns in India and international human rights law

How Google Perceives Customer Privacy, Cyber, E-Commerce, Political and Regulatory Compliance Risks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About