2020
DOI: 10.1177/0886260520975826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyberstalking Victimization: An Empirical Assessment of RAT Among Female Iranian College Students

Abstract: The role of routine activity theory (RAT) as a guiding theoretical approach to understand online victimization has been well documented. However, the recent emphasis in criminology on its applicability to online victimization has largely been based on evidence from Anglo-American studies. This study fills this gap by testing the predictive utility of RAT for cyberstalking victimization, using data from a sample of female Iranian students. Our structural equation model showed that online exposure to motivated o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(120 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As dating apps are predominantly used by individuals without oversight, capable guardians are lacking in this online environment. The Routine Activities Theory has been applied in multiple studies on cybervictimization (Aizenkot, 2022;Hawdon et al, 2017;Kabiri et al, 2022;Wick et al, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As dating apps are predominantly used by individuals without oversight, capable guardians are lacking in this online environment. The Routine Activities Theory has been applied in multiple studies on cybervictimization (Aizenkot, 2022;Hawdon et al, 2017;Kabiri et al, 2022;Wick et al, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, good online security management (i.e. engaging in privacy online) decreases cybercrime victimization, particularly phishing victimization (Naci and Christopher, 2020; Leanna, 2020; Jansen and Leukfeldt, 2016; Leukfeldt and Yar, 2016; Milani et al , 2020; Ab Rahman et al , 2017; Kabiri et al , 2020).…”
Section: Routine Activities Theory Revisitedmentioning
confidence: 99%