2009
DOI: 10.1108/03684920910932699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cybernetical physics Part II: the EPR paradox and its implications

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explain the Einstein, Podolski and Rosen (EPR) paradox applying the multidimensionality of time and the perpendicularity of the temporal axes.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is an extension of the application of neuropsychology to physics, as previously described in Part I, to cosmology.FindingsThe paper removes the apparent contradictions in physics implied by the EPR paradox.Practical implicationsA theoretical basis for a possible instantaneous (faster than light) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, complementarity inherent for the entire quantum domain is reinterpreted to be isomorphic to the mathematical duality of finiteness and infinity, for example, by means of the distinction of finite sets versus infinite sets in set theory. However, that viewpoint is 48 One can interpret the infinitesimal unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics by adding an additional "fifth" space-time dimension (e.g., as in: Wesson 2011) also interpretable as a second time dimension (Fidelman 2008). 49 For example, the paper of Blaylock (2010) interprets the relation of the "EPR paradox" to Bell's inequalities as the "question of locality".…”
Section: Entanglement As the Key For Quantum Gravity (Even From A Phi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, complementarity inherent for the entire quantum domain is reinterpreted to be isomorphic to the mathematical duality of finiteness and infinity, for example, by means of the distinction of finite sets versus infinite sets in set theory. However, that viewpoint is 48 One can interpret the infinitesimal unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics by adding an additional "fifth" space-time dimension (e.g., as in: Wesson 2011) also interpretable as a second time dimension (Fidelman 2008). 49 For example, the paper of Blaylock (2010) interprets the relation of the "EPR paradox" to Bell's inequalities as the "question of locality".…”
Section: Entanglement As the Key For Quantum Gravity (Even From A Phi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can interpret the infinitesimal unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics by adding an additional "fifth" space-time dimension (e.g. as in: Wesson 2011) also interpretable as a second time dimension(Fidelman 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%