Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Systems 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3372422.3373592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyberbullying Detection Using Deep Learning and Word Embeddings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both unsupervised and supervised ML, we do not consider Deep Learning. While the use of Deep Learning was proposed in recent literature on ML for social good ( Al-Hashedi et al, 2019 , Khatua et al, 2018 , Sawhney et al, 2018 ), the problem considered in this paper is characterized by a limited amount of data. Therefore, considering that Deep Learning provides accurate models when a vast amount of training data is available, we do not rely on this ML technique.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both unsupervised and supervised ML, we do not consider Deep Learning. While the use of Deep Learning was proposed in recent literature on ML for social good ( Al-Hashedi et al, 2019 , Khatua et al, 2018 , Sawhney et al, 2018 ), the problem considered in this paper is characterized by a limited amount of data. Therefore, considering that Deep Learning provides accurate models when a vast amount of training data is available, we do not rely on this ML technique.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dataset was first annotated by three human annotators for the presence of harassment and later for the two cyberbullying roles -bully and victim. More recent studies by Dadvar and Eckert (2018), Iwendi et al (2020), Gada, Damania, and Sankhe (2021), Al-Hashedi, Soon, andGoh (2019), Al-Garadi, Varathan, andRavana (2016), Paul and Saha (2020), and others have demonstrated accurate and precise binary cyberbullying classifications by leveraging above mentioned datasets and recent DL approaches to NLP such as Recurrent Neural Networks (Medsker and Jain, 2001), Long-term Short-term Memory (Sundermeyer, Schlüter, and Ney, 2012), Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) (Cho et al, 2014) and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) (Devlin et al, 2018). Though such studies have reported high accuracy and precision in their classification predictions, they are unable to detect the key elements of cyberbullying -as understood from a social science perspective.…”
Section: Binary Cyberbullying Detection Researchmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Deep learning algorithms, coupled with word embeddings in detecting cyberbullying texts, are the topic of much research work [17]. In a matrix of choices, three deep learning algorithms, namely GRU, LSTM, and BiLSTM, in conjunction with word embeddings models, including word2vec, GloVe, Reddit, and ELMO models, are used to examine the effectiveness and accuracy of a possible configuration for cyberbullying detection.…”
Section: Literature Review and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%