2020
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.5627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyberbullying detection in social media text based on character‐level convolutional neural network with shortcuts

Abstract: As people spend increasingly more time on social networks, cyberbullying has become a social problem that needs to be solved by machine learning methods. Our research focuses on textual cyberbullying detection because text is the most common form of social media. However, the content information in social media is short, noisy, and unstructured with incorrect spellings and symbols, and this impacts the performance of some traditional machine learning methods based on vocabulary knowledge. For this reason, we p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implications include depression, embarrassment, anger, humiliation, lack of self-esteem and confidence, loneliness, suicidal ideas, insecurity, harassment, and family issues (Odora, 2015). Cyberbullying is deemed to create negative online reputations for victims, which is able to impact college admissions, employment, and other areas of life, and may even cause more serious and permanent consequences of self-harm and suicide (Lu et al, 2020). Cyberbullying victims may experience depression or worse may commit suicide.…”
Section: Cyberbullying On Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implications include depression, embarrassment, anger, humiliation, lack of self-esteem and confidence, loneliness, suicidal ideas, insecurity, harassment, and family issues (Odora, 2015). Cyberbullying is deemed to create negative online reputations for victims, which is able to impact college admissions, employment, and other areas of life, and may even cause more serious and permanent consequences of self-harm and suicide (Lu et al, 2020). Cyberbullying victims may experience depression or worse may commit suicide.…”
Section: Cyberbullying On Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these two works, the oversampling method was handled for data processing, which led to overfitting of data, in other words, performance claims of the models in these two works had become overestimated. Lu et al [32] proposed a character-level convolutional neural network with shortcuts, their model turned out that char-level features could be learned to overcome spelling errors and intentional obfuscation in online posts. Zhang et al [33] introduced a method combining the one-dimensional CNN and the single GRU network, they experimented on the dataset of the Twitter platform and obtained an increase between 1 and 13% in F1-score.…”
Section: Cyberbullying Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major issues with the hybrid models are that the experimental results and evaluations are bound to a single dataset [10,28]. Automatic improper conversation (such as disgusting language and offensive chats) extraction is complicated and time consuming [32,[49][50][51].…”
Section: Related Research Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research utilized different data sources for analyzing cyberbullying detection systems and as such, only the reported performance measures are used for comparison. [22] 0.586 NLP [7] 0.950 Logistic Regression [64] 0.905 0.910 0.900 Decision Tree [23] 0.785 SVM [30] 0.780 0.780 LSTM [38] 0.9397 CNN [50] 0.960 Deep Learning Ensemble [46] 0.980 Tolba et al [65] recently performed an independent comparison of various machine learning and deep learning approaches using various encoding schemas for the detection of online harassment (no age limitations specified). Tolba et al's findings report an optimal geometric mean, F1 score, and AUROC of: 0.8107, 0.8107, 0.7612; all for systems that utilized GloVe with either a Bi-LSTM or LSTM based deep learning classifier.…”
Section: Comparison Of Malang With Existing State-of-the-art Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%