2017 1st International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icicos.2017.8276369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyberbullying classification using text mining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [28], Noviantho et al obtained a dataset from Kaggle, which contains ~12K tweets out of which 1068 were bullying ones. In their approach, they used machine learning techniques such as SVM and naïves along with N gram technique.…”
Section: Machine Learning Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [28], Noviantho et al obtained a dataset from Kaggle, which contains ~12K tweets out of which 1068 were bullying ones. In their approach, they used machine learning techniques such as SVM and naïves along with N gram technique.…”
Section: Machine Learning Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both methods are used to learn the usage context of a word. Global vector space [20], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30] Distance Measures Edit-Distance [20] Word Embedding Word2Vec [31], [32], [28], [33], [34], [35], [30], [36], [37], [38], [39] Skip-gram [25] CBoW [25], [32] BoW [40], [31], [33], [34] TF-IDF [26], [27] FastText [25], [36] GLoVe [41], [42], [37] LSHWE [37] Vulgarity/Hate Features [43], [25], [32], [33], [44] Sentiment Sentiment Analysis [27], [45], [32], [33], [41], [46], [30], [39] User Profile [27],…”
Section: Word Embedding Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study concluded that it was difficult to classify cyberbullying due to the data sparseness and the degree to which the categories are lexicalized. Similarly, [13] proposed a classification model with optimal accuracy for identifying cyberbully conversation in social media platform known as Formspring.me implementing Naive Bayes method and Support Vector Machine (SVM), and later applied n-gram 1 to 5 for the number of class 2, 4, and 11 for each method. The result yields an average accuracy of 92.81% through the Naive Bayes and the SVM with a poly kernel yields an average accuracy of 97.11%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%