Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Systems (CPMS)

Jakovljević, Živana; Majstorovic, Vidosav D.; Stojadinović, Slavenko M.; Živković, Sanja; Gligorijevic, Nemanja; Pajić, Miroslav

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56430-2_14

Cited by 15 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on the recent advances in sensing technology, connectivity, and computer science, systems in the new era of manufacturing industry have transformed into CPS, which refer to the new generation of systems that integrate computational and physical capabilities, while offering interoperability and resilience [98]. Thus, CPS refer to systems that incorporate physical processes and embedded computing elements (e.g., smart sensors and actuators) allowing a real-time interaction, which eases the exchange of information for tasks such as monitoring, control, and management of CPS [98,99,100]. Regarding connectivity, CPS can set up and use connections with the other systems (including human beings) in global networks for establishing cooperation and collaboration schemes among different systems [99,101].…”

Section: Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, due to the size, interactions and connections between elements, and the complex dynamics of manufacturing systems, CPS can be regarded as systems of systems that can be implemented at all levels of manufacturing industry (machine, line, plant level), since they represent the physical and embedded computational parts that work in a cooperative way. Then, the implementation of CPS together with Internet of Things (IoT) has fomented the transformation towards the Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Systems (CPMS), which represent the highest level of CPS application in manufacturing industry [100].This fact is given since the connectivity through IoT allows a better knowledge of the manufacturing systems, their energy consumption in real time, and the behavior of supplychain markets related to the industrial activity. In this regard, IoT is considered as an integrated/enabled technology rather than a technology to improve the energy efficiency, which eases the design and implementation in real time of both the energy-efficiency and energy cost reduction control strategies [102].…”

Section: Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Energy efficiency in discrete-manufacturing systems: Insights, trends, and control strategies

Diaz

Ocampo‐Martínez

2019

Journal of Manufacturing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the depletion of fossil energy sources, rising energy prices, and governmental regulation restrictions, the current manufacturing industry is shifting towards more efficient and sustainable systems. This transformation has promoted the identification of energy saving opportunities and the development of new technologies and strategies oriented to improve the energy efficiency of such systems. This paper outlines and discusses most of the research reported during the last decade regarding energy efficiency in manufacturing systems, the current technologies and strategies to improve that efficiency, identifying and remarking those related to the design of management/control strategies. Based on this fact, this paper aims to provide a review of strategies for reducing energy consumption and optimizing the use of resources within a plant into the context of discrete manufacturing. The review performed concerning the current context of manufacturing systems, control systems implemented, and their transformation towards Industry 4.0 might be useful in both the academic and industrial dimension to identify trends and critical points and suggest further research lines.

show abstract

Section: Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Energy efficiency in discrete-manufacturing systems: Insights, trends, and control strategies

Diaz

Ocampo‐Martínez

2019

Journal of Manufacturing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The European H2020 research agenda considers CPSs to be 'the next generation of embedded Information and Communication Technology (ICT) systems that are interconnected and collaborating, providing citizens and businesses with a wide range of innovative applications and services' [1]. CPSs applied to the fields of manufacturing or production are often referred to as cyber-physical manufacturing systems (CPMSs) or cyber-physical production systems (CPPSs) [2] and are expected to increase efficiency, precision, and performance as well as bring unprecedented flexibility to the industrial manufacturing process.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cyber-physical manufacturing systems: An architecture for sensor integration, production line simulation and cloud services

Prist¹,

Monteriù²,

Pallotta³

et al. 2020

ACTA IMEKO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The pillars of Industry 4.0 require the integration of a modern smart factory, data storage in the Cloud, access to the Cloud for data analytics, and information sharing at the software level for simulation and hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) capabilities. The resulting cyber-physical system (CPS) is often termed the cyber-physical manufacturing system, and it has become crucial to cope with this increased system complexity and to attain the desired performances. However, since a great number of old production systems are based on monolithic architectures with limited external communication ports and reduced local computational capabilities, it is difficult to ensure such production lines are compliant with the Industry 4.0 pillars. A wireless sensor network is one solution for the smart connection of a production line to a CPS elaborating data through cloud computing. The scope of this research work lies in developing a modular software architecture based on the open service gateway initiative framework, which is able to seamlessly integrate both hardware and software wireless sensors, send data into the Cloud for further data analysis and enable both HIL and cloud computing capabilities. The CPS architecture was initially tested using HIL tools before it was deployed within a real manufacturing line for data collection and analysis over a period of two months.

show abstract

“…Cyber‐physical systems (CPSs) are physical embedded systems with enhanced operations for monitoring, coordination, control, and integration by a computing and communication core . Examples of CPSs include transportations systems, medical systems, and manufacturing systems . A CPS can be security‐critical, safety‐critical, or both.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Security‐ and safety‐critical cyber‐physical systems

Mashkoor

Sametinger

Bíró

et al. 2019

J Software Evolu Process

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cyber-physical systems (CPSs) are physical embedded systems with enhanced operations for monitoring, coordination, control, and integration by a computing and communication core. 1 Examples of CPSs include transportations systems, 2 medical systems, 3 and manufacturing systems. 4 A CPS can be security-critical, safety-critical, or both. A CPS communicating with the outside world and thus opening an attack vector through the communication channel is considered to be a security-critical CPS. On the other hand, a CPS is considered to be safety-critical if it can harm its environment, eg, a malfunctioning autonomous vehicle might harm its passengers. 5 A CPS dealing with both security and safety concerns is considered to be a security-and safety-critical CPS.Contemporary systems and software engineering methods often prove inadequate for the trustworthy and reliable design and engineering of CPSs. Traditional engineering deals with security and safety issues as separate problems. However, given the coordination and communication J Softw Evol Proc. 2020;32:e2239. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/smr answers some important research questions about Robot Operating System (ROS), eg, what are the required characteristics and thresholds for a ROS-based architecture, what safety assumptions are defined during the safety case definition, what ROS aspects are relevant for cross reuse and for its certification, and what is the impact of adding secure communications implementation to a ROS-based component. The paper also analyses functional safety, impact of Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) encryption mechanism and timing constraints-required for assuring a secure communication between components as suggested by the ISO 26262-of the proposed prototype.We hope this special issue serves as a drop in the ocean of knowledge on improving the state of the art regarding security and safety of CPSs.

show abstract

Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Systems (CPMS)

Cited by 15 publications

References 22 publications

Energy efficiency in discrete-manufacturing systems: Insights, trends, and control strategies

Energy efficiency in discrete-manufacturing systems: Insights, trends, and control strategies

Cyber-physical manufacturing systems: An architecture for sensor integration, production line simulation and cloud services

Security‐ and safety‐critical cyber‐physical systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About