2021
DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2020.3032571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyber–Physical Codesign of Field-Level Reconfigurations in Networked Motion Controllers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to the shift from centralized to NCK distributed at distribution point 4 for ADCAI and distribution point 5 for ADCBI [23] and in industrial practice networked motion control systems can be encountered more and more. These systems include [24]:…”
Section: Distribution Of Motion Control Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to the shift from centralized to NCK distributed at distribution point 4 for ADCAI and distribution point 5 for ADCBI [23] and in industrial practice networked motion control systems can be encountered more and more. These systems include [24]:…”
Section: Distribution Of Motion Control Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature [2] designed a data transceiver algorithm to increase the stability of EtherCAT masters. In [3], an EtherCAT frame detection function was developed to decrease the frame loss rate. In [4], an exponential moving average (EMA) filter was adopted to reduce synchronization errors in EtherCAT systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%