2014
DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2014.895476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyber-Campaigning in Denmark: Application and Effects of Candidate Campaigning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
37
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…New media are still complementary to traditional media and are not likely to replace other campaign activities completely (Towner and Dulio, 2012, p. 99 A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 7 Facebook, and Twitter have become an integral part of the campaign mix, both for politicians and for voters (Hansen and Kosiara-Pedersen, 2014b;Skovsgaard and Van Dalen, 2013). Since setting the campaign agenda can give politicians important electoral advantages (e.g.…”
Section: Facebook Agenda: Controlled Semi-public and Flexiblementioning
confidence: 97%
“…New media are still complementary to traditional media and are not likely to replace other campaign activities completely (Towner and Dulio, 2012, p. 99 A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 7 Facebook, and Twitter have become an integral part of the campaign mix, both for politicians and for voters (Hansen and Kosiara-Pedersen, 2014b;Skovsgaard and Van Dalen, 2013). Since setting the campaign agenda can give politicians important electoral advantages (e.g.…”
Section: Facebook Agenda: Controlled Semi-public and Flexiblementioning
confidence: 97%
“…With the impact of social media tools in the election victory of Barack Obama in the USA, recent studies have focused on the use of social media in election campaigns (for USA see Sweetser Trammell 2007;Williams et al 2005;Robertson et al 2010;Williams and Gulati 2009b, c;Sweetser and Lariscy 2008;Gulati and Williams 2011;Williams and Gulati 2012;Gueorguieva 2008;Church 2010;Klotz 2010;Steger et al 2010;Towner and Dulio 2011;Bimber 2014-for other countries see Gibson and McAllister 2011;Vesnic-Alujevic 2011;Andersen and Medaglia 2009;Carlson and Strandberg 2008;Larsson and Moe 2011;Larsson 2014;Gilmore 2011;Chen and Smith 2011;Strandberg 2013;Hansen and Kosiara-Pedersen 2014). Similarly, studies related to the use of social media in election campaigns mostly investigate American experiences.…”
Section: Literature Review: Identifying the Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, although they had a positive effect on the vote, Web 2.0 campaigns did not generate significantly higher rates of support. Hansen and Kosiara-Pedersen (2014), who focused on the cyber-campaigning of candidates in 2011 Danish general elections, determined an online score for each candidate and argued that the online scores of candidates have an effect on the interparty competition for personal votes but have no significant effect when controlling for other relevant variables. Yannas et al (2011) found that online presence did not significantly affect local elections in Greece in 2010, although the winning candidates used Web 1.0 and 2.0 tools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%