2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyanotoxins: Characteristics, production and degradation routes in drinking water treatment with reference to the situation in Serbia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
35
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 208 publications
1
35
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it also constitutes a concern because of the potential for accumulation of extreme concentrations of intracellular toxins (Zamyadi et al, 2012). Hence, degradation processes contributing to their removal in drinking water treatment have received greater attention (Pantelić et al, 2013;Zamyadi et al, 2012). During coagulation and flocculation in a DWTP, accumulated cyanobacterial cells lose their viability and break down in 1-5 days depending on the type and dosage of coagulants and species of cyanobacteria (Drikas et al, 2001;Ho et al, 2012a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it also constitutes a concern because of the potential for accumulation of extreme concentrations of intracellular toxins (Zamyadi et al, 2012). Hence, degradation processes contributing to their removal in drinking water treatment have received greater attention (Pantelić et al, 2013;Zamyadi et al, 2012). During coagulation and flocculation in a DWTP, accumulated cyanobacterial cells lose their viability and break down in 1-5 days depending on the type and dosage of coagulants and species of cyanobacteria (Drikas et al, 2001;Ho et al, 2012a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain development activities, including agriculture, industry, and urbanization, are often important drivers of changes in environmental conditions of lotic ecosystems (Chen and Hong 2012;Staley et al 2014), and the functions and community dynamics of plankton ecosystem (e.g., nutrient recycling, organic matter content) can strongly influence water quality (Fuhrman 2009;Hanson et al 2012). Indeed, a wide range of toxins and algae blooms triggered by plankton community changes can negatively affect the municipal water supply (Yang et al 2012;Pantelić et al 2013). Therefore, the plankton community is generally thought to be a good indicator of ecosystem status and water quality, as ecosystem variations are reflected in relatively quick changes in plankton community composition (Bianchi et al 2003;Crump et al 2007;Yang et al 2012;Liu et al 2013;Staley et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was suggested that MCs could be involved because concentrations of MC were significantly higher in the pond and river. Similarly, in Serbia, Svircev et al[181] and Pantelic et al[184] detected upto 650 µg/L MC-LR in reservoirs that were used for drinking water and 2.5 µg/L in the tap water, well over the WHO-recommended MAC for drinking water. The authors also observed associations between high incidences of death due to primary liver cancer in regions where FHABs were intensified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%