2016
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2016.1207265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyanobacteria blooms in three eutrophic basins of the Great Lakes: a comparative analysis using satellite remote sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remote sensing provides information on broad spatial and temporal scales unattainable by other means, and is an attractive tool to monitor short-and long-term change in lakes (e.g., Binding et al, 2007;Hu et al, 2010;Mouw et al, 2015;Sayers et al, 2016). The quality of remote sensing products is critical to interpreting ecological trends and linkages to underlying drivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing provides information on broad spatial and temporal scales unattainable by other means, and is an attractive tool to monitor short-and long-term change in lakes (e.g., Binding et al, 2007;Hu et al, 2010;Mouw et al, 2015;Sayers et al, 2016). The quality of remote sensing products is critical to interpreting ecological trends and linkages to underlying drivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notable inland water quality applications of remote sensing include large-scale quality and clarity surveys [1][2][3][4] and real-time tracking and forecasting of nuisance algal blooms (NABs) or harmful algal blooms (HABs) [5,6]. The general process of developing an empirical remote sensing model for algal blooms typically involves: downloading and processing of remote sensing imagery (which may include atmospheric correction and conversion from digital numbers to reflectance at the near-surface of the water body), collecting coincident (or near-coincident) field measurements of chlorophyll-a (or other parameters related to biomass or levels of toxins), and using regression or other statistical modeling techniques to develop a relationship between the field-measured concentrations and remotely sensed reflectance from the corresponding pixel or group of pixels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultures were stored for a maximum of 2 wk, and if they were not used in that time, they were discarded. Cyanobacterial cultures were used at a density of 100 to 200 µg/L chlorophyll a , which is within the reported range for dense cyanobacterial blooms worldwide (Yuan et al ; Sayers et al ; Duan et al ). Microcystis aeruginosa (UTEX) was purchased through the Culture Collection of Algae at The University of Texas at Austin, M. aeruginosa (GLERL) was provided by the Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab, and Anabaena flos‐aquae , Aphanizomenon flos‐aquae , Dolichospermum lemmermannii , Gloeotrichia echinulata , M. aeruginosa (BQ11‐02, ZUR‐HINDAK, and LSC‐13‐02), M. wesenbergii , and Planktothrix suspensa were provided by Environment and Climate Change Canada.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%