2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-18166-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyanide treatment of mining tailings using suspended biomass and moving bed biomass reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kaldnes K1 micro presented 88.0% COD removal rate on day 7, which was the highest removal rate compared to the rest of the carriers, due to its narrow inner compartments. In comparison, a previous study obtained only 69% reduction in total cyanide‐containing mining tailings after 141 days of operation in an MBBR 28 …”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kaldnes K1 micro presented 88.0% COD removal rate on day 7, which was the highest removal rate compared to the rest of the carriers, due to its narrow inner compartments. In comparison, a previous study obtained only 69% reduction in total cyanide‐containing mining tailings after 141 days of operation in an MBBR 28 …”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…In comparison, a previous study obtained only 69% reduction in total cyanide-containing mining tailings after 141 days of operation in an MBBR. 28 If the process is continued for more than 7 days, the small carrier will certainly produce an unstable performance and lower COD removal rates, which can be termed the 'carrier efficiency limit'. This limit refers to the carrier's ability to entrap suspended biomass and to immobilize free microorganisms, where the better ability, the higher the COD removal rates.…”
Section: Synthetic Biofilm Carriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the adsorption technique is expensive, and sometimes it is not sustainable due to the use of chemical substances. Another approach is biological treatment [51]. This method is more environmentally friendly than other methods and less costly, but it is mostly used for cyanide-contaminated wastewater and not for drinking water treatment.…”
Section: Experimental and Mathematical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for chemical oxidation, this involves removing mainly free cyanide and its weak bonds [12]. The decision about which is best will depend on factors such as the cost of the treatment, the available space to be used, the initial concentrations of the contaminant and the amount of waste to be treated, among others [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%