“…A variety of practical and technical limitations may contribute to this, including: the evolution of new array technologies over time, the likelihood of etiologic heterogeneity of SZ (Arnedo et al, 2015; Tsuang and Faraone, 1995), the use of small sample sizes, and the inability to adequately protect against type-I errors, all of which exacerbate the “winner’s-curse” phenomenon that undermines replication. In light of these issues, several studies have sought to consolidate the knowledge of transcriptomic abnormalities in SZ via meta-analysis (Bergon et al, 2015; Mistry and Pavlidis, 2010; Mistry et al, 2013a; Pérez-Santiago et al, 2012). These studies bolstered confidence by employing consistent preprocessing methods and demonstrating some similar dysregulated genes and network features across different studies; the implicated biological functions included oxidative phosphorylation, protein and nucleotide metabolism, synaptic transmission, myelination and glial function, and immune function, each of which have been implicated in previous work (Åberg et al, 2006; Dean, 2011; Devor and Waziri, 1993; Fineberg and Ellman, 2013; Middleton et al, 2002; Potvin et al, 2008).…”