2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01514.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CWD Prevalence, Perceived Human Health Risks, and State Influences on Deer Hunting Participation

Abstract: This study examined factors predicted by previous research to influence hunters' decisions to stop hunting deer in a state. Data were obtained from mail surveys of resident and nonresident deer hunters in Arizona, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin (n = 3,518). Hunters were presented with six scenarios depicting hypothetical CWD prevalence levels and human health risks from the disease (e.g., death), and asked if they would continue or stop hunting deer in the state. Bivariate analyses examined the infl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Avoiding increased prevalence appears to have higher welfare impacts than avoiding increased spread. A similar response has been noted by Vaske and Lyon (2011) where increasing prevalence was identified as the strongest factor influencing a decision to stop hunting. Cumulative welfare impacts for the province are also provided.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Avoiding increased prevalence appears to have higher welfare impacts than avoiding increased spread. A similar response has been noted by Vaske and Lyon (2011) where increasing prevalence was identified as the strongest factor influencing a decision to stop hunting. Cumulative welfare impacts for the province are also provided.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Using data from the eight state regional study, Vaske and Lyon (2010) examined the individual and combined influence of CWD prevalence, perceived human health risks, CWD versus non-CWD state, and state of residency on hunters' decisions to stop hunting deer in Arizona, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. In the bivariate analyses, prevalence was the strongest predictor of quitting hunting in the state followed by hypothetical human death and perceived risk.…”
Section: Lesson 1: Hunters Vary In Their Behavioral Response To Cwdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to other forms of environmental management, wildlife management is often contentious because it involves diverse stakeholders with conflicting views about how wildlife‐related risks should be addressed as well as a great degree of uncertainty about how to best manage for the needs of people, wildlife, and habitat . As a result, there is an increasing interest among risk managers to better understand risk perceptions associated with wildlife and wildlife management, as well as factors that influence those perceptions and how they spread …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%