2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.intmar.2016.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutting Through the Online Review Jungle — Investigating Selective eWOM Processing

Abstract: Consumers frequently rely on online reviews, a prominent form of electronic word-ofmouth (eWOM), before taking a purchase decision. However, consumers are usually confronted with hundreds of reviews for a single product or service, as well as rich information cues on review websites (review texts, helpfulness ratings, author information, etc.). In turn, consumers face more information cues on online review websites than they can or want to process, and are likely to proceed selectively. This paper investigates… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, WOM is often so voluminous that even motivated receivers may adopt selective processing strategies, resulting in attention to only certain WOM components. For example, some receivers (i.e., swift pessimists ) pay little attention to review text and rely mostly on negatively valenced reviews (Gottschalk & Mafael, ).…”
Section: Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, WOM is often so voluminous that even motivated receivers may adopt selective processing strategies, resulting in attention to only certain WOM components. For example, some receivers (i.e., swift pessimists ) pay little attention to review text and rely mostly on negatively valenced reviews (Gottschalk & Mafael, ).…”
Section: Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of current research assumes a motivated receiver who is seeking WOM, and is therefore paying attention to components of WOM such as summary statistics, message content, or sender characteristics. Future work on the first step in the WOM journey could consider additional motivations or selective processing strategies (e.g., Gottschalk & Mafael, ), and how these affect later steps in the receivers’ journey. Alternately, researchers could examine whether motivation and selective processing work simultaneously or sequentially to affect receivers’ consumption of WOM and therefore its impact.…”
Section: The Impact Of Wommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned mechanisms not only help alleviate consumers' information overload [48,72,73] but also help online customers to immediately focus on those reviews that are perceived to have the higher diagnosticity [82,150] as their information cues are more relevant [110]. Moreover, they help online consumers already familiar with ORs to carry out selective eWOM processing to deal with information overload [55].…”
Section: Orh and Financial Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before a real-world purchase, consumers will focus on products/services covered by positively valenced reviews rather than negatively valenced reviews. When deciding between two or more alternative products/services covered by ORs displaying the same positive ratings, the degree of ORH might work as a facilitating heuristic [36] allowing customers to enhance their selective eWOM processing [55] prior to choosing between two or more positively rated alternatives. As such, helpfulness votes work as a "decision-making cue" [134] that helps consumers that have already a proxy of the quality of the product/ service reviewed (i.e., the ratings) to opt for those alternatives whose positive reviews are voted as more helpful.…”
Section: The Moderating Effect Of the Degree Of Orh On The Relationshmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation