2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutting the costs of attrition: Results from the Indonesia Family Life Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
59
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Family Life Survey, Kagera Health and Development Survey, and Kenya Life Panel Survey all successfully reinterview more than 80% of the target respondents at least ten years after the baseline (Baird et al, Forthcoming;Beegle et al, 2011;Thomas et al, 2012). However, these studies use tracking protocols that are unlikely to be feasible in a high-frequency panel.…”
Section: Benchmarks For Missed Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Family Life Survey, Kagera Health and Development Survey, and Kenya Life Panel Survey all successfully reinterview more than 80% of the target respondents at least ten years after the baseline (Baird et al, Forthcoming;Beegle et al, 2011;Thomas et al, 2012). However, these studies use tracking protocols that are unlikely to be feasible in a high-frequency panel.…”
Section: Benchmarks For Missed Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies use tracking protocols that are unlikely to be feasible in a high-frequency panel. Each round of these surveys may take several months to complete, with several more month spent tracking difficult-to-locate respondents or respondents who have migrated (Thomas et al, 2012). High-frequency panels inherently have a short timeframe for completing each interview, increasing the risk of missed interviews.…”
Section: Benchmarks For Missed Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential worry associated with attrition is that there might be systematic differences between those who are reinterviewed and those who attrit. As Thomas et al (2012) 5 This assumption can be relaxed. Time-varying measurement errors are discussed in the instrument validity section (in Section 6.1).…”
Section: Data and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summary statistics for all control variables are reported in the appendix. IFLS is not fielded Thomas et al (2012) find that attrition is selected on not only age, location and gender but also socio-economic characteristics in IFLS. They show that respondents who were found, but tracked over long distances resemble more attriters who were never found, than they do respondents who were found but never moved.…”
Section: Data and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loss of cases throughout the study period is a common problem in longitudinal studies (Aneshensel et al 1989;Thomas et al 2012). However, if they could not be found in the second interview, the chance of finding them for the third interview reduced significantly and, therefore, potentially very valuable data would be completely lost.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%