Cutting performance wearing different studded soccer shoes on dry and wet artificial turf

Clercq, Dirk De; Debuyck, Gijs; Gerlo, Joeri; Rambour, Stijn; Segers, Veerle; Caekenberghe, Ine Van

doi:10.1080/19424280.2014.895056

Cited by 21 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 7 publications

(6 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The absence of significant differences in Side Hop Test performance between different cleat models in both groups, seems to refute the hypothesis that structural differences of the models are sufficient to influence athletes' functional performance. Similar results were described when TF, AG and FG models were compared during sprints (De Clercq et al, 2014). Thus, it does not seem necessary to choose a specific cleat model to optimize performance on dry artificial grass fields.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 67%

Different Cleat Models do Not Influence Side Hop Test Performance of Soccer Players with and without Chronic Ankle Instability

Silva

Santos

Vilas-Boas

et al. 2019

Journal of Human Kinetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The lateral ankle sprain is one of the most common sport injury, representing 10-30% of all musculoskeletal disorders. The lateral ankle sprain is induced by sport gestures involving changes of direction and landing manoeuvres and constitutes a risk factor for the occurrence of chronic ankle instability. Although cleat models and performance have been already explored, no study has evaluated this relationship in athletes with chronic ankle instability. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to analyse the influence of different soccer cleat models on Side Hop Test performance of athletes with and without chronic ankle instability. Thirty-nine athletes were divided into two groups, a chronic ankle instability group (n = 20) and a healthy group (n = 19). Each participant performed the Side Hop Test, executing 10 consecutive jumps on dry artificial grass with 4 cleat models. The Qualisys System and two force platforms were used to analyse the test runtime, the distance travelled and the mean velocity. No statistically significant interaction was observed between the group and the cleat model for all variables evaluated. In addition, no differences were observed between models or groups. In this specific test, performance does not seem to be influenced by different cleat models on dry artificial grass in athletes with and without chronic ankle instability.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 67%

Different Cleat Models do Not Influence Side Hop Test Performance of Soccer Players with and without Chronic Ankle Instability

Silva

Santos

Vilas-Boas

et al. 2019

Journal of Human Kinetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It has been seen that the condition of the playing field is also a factor which affects the soccer player’s performance [14] . The surface–player interaction has been linked to the association between the different kinds of surfaces and sports footwear [15] – [18] . The first comparative studies between surfaces focused on the lower injury rates associated with natural grass compared to those associated with artificial turf [19] , [20] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of the Mechanical Properties of Third-Generation Artificial Turf Systems on Soccer Players’ Physiological and Physical Performance and Their Perceptions

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this research was to evaluate the influence of the mechanical properties of artificial turf systems on soccer players’ performance. A battery of perceptive physiological and physical tests were developed on four different structural systems of artificial turf (System 1: Compacted gravel sub-base without elastic layer; System 2: Compacted gravel sub-base with elastic layer; System 3: Asphalt sub-base without elastic layer; System 4: Asphalt sub-base with elastic layer). The sample was composed of 18 soccer players (22.44±1.72 years) who typically train and compete on artificial turf. The artificial turf system with less rotational traction (S3) showed higher total time in the Repeated Sprint Ability test in comparison to the systems with intermediate values (49.46±1.75 s vs 47.55±1.82 s (S1) and 47.85±1.59 s (S2); p<0.001). The performance in jumping tests (countermovement jump and squat jump) and ball kicking to goal decreased after the RSA test in all surfaces assessed (p<0.05), since the artificial turf system did not affect performance deterioration (p>0.05). The physiological load was similar in all four artificial turf systems. However, players felt more comfortable on the harder and more rigid system (S4; visual analogue scale = 70.83±14.28) than on the softer artificial turf system (S2; visual analogue scale = 54.24±19.63). The lineal regression analysis revealed a significant influence of the mechanical properties of the surface of 16.5%, 15.8% and 7.1% on the mean time of the sprint, the best sprint time and the maximum mean speed in the RSA test respectively. Results suggest a mechanical heterogeneity between the systems of artificial turf which generate differences in the physical performance and in the soccer players’ perceptions.

show abstract

“…In wet conditions, the running time was increased with the TF model in relation to AG and FG models. The smaller studs founded in the TF model decreases their traction and therefore their performance [25]. The research about this theme has increased along time, especially in artificial grass supporting the growing incentive by FIFA for the use of this type of ground [4, 5].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Cleats-Surface Interaction on the Performance and Risk of Injury in Soccer: A Systematic Review

Silva

Santos

Vilas-Boas

et al. 2017

Applied Bionics and Biomechanics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To review the influence of cleats-surface interaction on the performance and risk of injury in soccer athletes. Design Systematic review. Data Sources Scopus, Web of science, PubMed, and B-on. Eligibility Criteria Full experimental and original papers, written in English that studied the influence of soccer cleats on sports performance and injury risk in artificial or natural grass. Results Twenty-three articles were included in this review: nine related to performance and fourteen to injury risk. On artificial grass, the soft ground model on dry and wet conditions and the turf model in wet conditions are related to worse performance. Compared to rounded studs, bladed ones improve performance during changes of directions in both natural and synthetic grass. Cleat models presenting better traction on the stance leg improve ball velocity while those presenting a homogeneous pressure across the foot promote better kicking accuracy. Bladed studs can be considered less secure by increasing plantar pressure on lateral border. The turf model decrease peak plantar pressure compared to other studded models. Conclusion The soft ground model provides lower performance especially on artificial grass, while the turf model provides a high protective effect in both fields.

show abstract

Cutting performance wearing different studded soccer shoes on dry and wet artificial turf

Cited by 21 publications

References 7 publications

Different Cleat Models do Not Influence Side Hop Test Performance of Soccer Players with and without Chronic Ankle Instability

Different Cleat Models do Not Influence Side Hop Test Performance of Soccer Players with and without Chronic Ankle Instability

Influence of the Mechanical Properties of Third-Generation Artificial Turf Systems on Soccer Players’ Physiological and Physical Performance and Their Perceptions

Influence of Cleats-Surface Interaction on the Performance and Risk of Injury in Soccer: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About