2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00850-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutting performance and wear characteristics of PVD coated and uncoated carbide tools in face milling Inconel 718 aerospace alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Cutting inserts were coated carbide as used with Settineri and Lerga [16] and Jawaid et al [17] with the standard designation (ISO) of SNGN 120408 with radius nose of 0.8 mm, commercialized by Sandvik under GC1025. The tool holder used in this experimental study has the standard designation of CSBNR2525M12 with the following angles: χr = 45°, α = 6°, γ = -6° and λ = -6° as mentioned in Coromant [18].…”
Section: Fig 1 Set-up and Design Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cutting inserts were coated carbide as used with Settineri and Lerga [16] and Jawaid et al [17] with the standard designation (ISO) of SNGN 120408 with radius nose of 0.8 mm, commercialized by Sandvik under GC1025. The tool holder used in this experimental study has the standard designation of CSBNR2525M12 with the following angles: χr = 45°, α = 6°, γ = -6° and λ = -6° as mentioned in Coromant [18].…”
Section: Fig 1 Set-up and Design Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cutting inserts were coated carbide (Settineri et al, 2008;Jawaid et al, 2001), with the standard designation (ISO) of SNGN 1204 with radius nose of 0.8 mm, commercialized by Sandvik under GC1025 (Sandvik, 2009). The tool holder used in this experimental study has the standard designation of CSBNR2525M12 with the following angles: χr = 45°, α = 6°, γ = -6° and λ = -6°.…”
Section: Materials and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When faced milling of Inconel 718 aerospace alloy, Jawaid et al (2001) obtained that the PVD TiN coated tools award a better performance than the uncoated tool at cutting speed of 50 m/min and feed rate of 0.08 mm per tooth. Results of machinability investigation of Incone1 718 (Rahman et al, 1997), indicated that the allowable speed and feed ranges for machining Inconel 718 were at notably low levels and tool life of the inserts decreased when the speed or the feed was increased; this is due to the commonly experienced high cutting forces, low thermal conductivity, abrasiveness and work hardening tendencies of work material, resulting in high heat generated at the cutting edge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jawaid et al (2001), conducted experiments regarding the face milling if inconel 718 where the effect of cutting speed and feed on the tool wear were investigated by using a PVD TiN coated and uncoated tungsten carbide inserts. It was concluded that the uncoated inserts performed better at lower speeds while the coated inserts gave a better performance at higher speeds [6]. Sharman et al (2001), worked in the area of tool life using TiAlN and CrN coated tungsten carbide ball end milling cutters.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%