2006
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.4.2079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutting Edge: Gut Microenvironment Promotes Differentiation of a Unique Memory CD8 T Cell Population

Abstract: Whether tissue microenvironment influences memory CD8 T cell differentiation is unclear. We demonstrate that virus-specific intraepithelial lymphocytes in gut resemble neither central nor effector memory CD8 T cells isolated from spleen or blood. This unique phenotype arises in situ within the gut, suggesting that anatomic location plays an inductive role in the memory differentiation program. In support of this hypothesis, memory CD8 T cells changed phenotype upon change in location. After transfer and in viv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
347
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(378 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(38 reference statements)
27
347
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our article also shows that systemic CD8 ϩ T lymphocytes up-regulate mucosal homing markers and rapidly migrate to mucosal surfaces following intramuscular immunization, providing a mechanism for the capacity of systemic vaccines to elicit mucosal cellular immune memory. These findings are consistent with previous observations regarding the phenotypic plasticity of systemic and mucosal CD8 ϩ T lymphocytes (12) and their ability to be dynamically reprogrammed with respect to tissue homing capacity after initial priming in peripheral lymph nodes (13). Thus, it is clear that mucosal immunization strategies are not necessarily required for inducing mucosal immunity.…”
Section: Letters To the Editor Letters To The Editorsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Our article also shows that systemic CD8 ϩ T lymphocytes up-regulate mucosal homing markers and rapidly migrate to mucosal surfaces following intramuscular immunization, providing a mechanism for the capacity of systemic vaccines to elicit mucosal cellular immune memory. These findings are consistent with previous observations regarding the phenotypic plasticity of systemic and mucosal CD8 ϩ T lymphocytes (12) and their ability to be dynamically reprogrammed with respect to tissue homing capacity after initial priming in peripheral lymph nodes (13). Thus, it is clear that mucosal immunization strategies are not necessarily required for inducing mucosal immunity.…”
Section: Letters To the Editor Letters To The Editorsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…S3A). The high levels of CD69 and CD103 in SMG P14 memory T cells were reminiscent of the previously described phenotype of P14 memory T cells isolated from the IEL compartment (7). In contrast to P14 memory T cells in SMG, P14 IEL were negative for Ly6C but could also be stained with E-cadherin-specific mAb (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Virus-specific CD8 T RM cells have been described in sensory ganglia, skin, brain, and intestinal mucosa (4-11). Common features of differently localized T RM cells are the expressions of the α E β 7 integrin CD103 and of CD69 (4,5,7,9). Submandibular glands (SMG) are accessory organs of the oral mucosa and well-characterized effector sites of the mucosal IgA response (12, 13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although cells of this phenotype display a limited lifespan and proliferative capacity compared with KLRG1 lo IL-7R hi memory CD8 + T cells in circulation, they can offer enhanced protection to some types of pathogens due to elevated cytotoxic activity (Jabbari and Harty, 2006;Olson et al, 2013) and, interestingly, are more prominently observed after serial infections (Masopust et al, 2006;Wirth et al, 2010;Joshi et al, 2011;Fraser et al, 2013;Olson et al, 2013). Thus, it will be important to determine if sustained ZEB2 expression is necessary for maintenance of this population of T EM cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%