Cutpoints for Low Appendicular Lean Mass That Identify Older Adults With Clinically Significant Weakness

Abstract

Background.Low lean mass is potentially clinically important in older persons, but criteria have not been empirically validated. As part of the FNIH (Foundation for the National Institutes of Health) Sarcopenia Project, this analysis sought to identify cutpoints in lean mass by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry that discriminate the presence or absence of weakness (defined in a previous report in the series as grip strength <26kg in men and <16kg in women).Methods.In pooled cross-sectional data stratified by sex (7,582 men and 3,688 women), classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to derive cutpoints for appendicular lean body mass (ALM) that best discriminated the presence or absence of weakness. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to quantify the strength of the association between lean mass category and weakness.Results.In primary analyses, CART models identified cutpoints for low lean mass (ALM <19.75kg in men and <15.02kg in women). Sensitivity analyses using ALM divided by body mass index (BMI: ALMBMI) identified a secondary definition (ALMBMI <0.789 in men and ALMBMI <0.512 in women). As expected, after accounting for study and age, low lean mass (compared with higher lean mass) was associated with weakness by both the primary (men, odds ratio [OR]: 6.9 [95% CI: 5.4, 8.9]; women, OR: 3.6 [95% CI: 2.9, 4.3]) and secondary definitions (men, OR: 4.3 [95% CI: 3.4, 5.5]; women, OR: 2.2 [95% CI: 1.8, 2.8]).Conclusions.ALM cutpoints derived from a large, diverse sample of older adults identified lean mass thresholds below which older adults had a higher likelihood of weakness.

Mediterranean Diet attenuates risk of frailty and sarcopenia: New insights and future directions

“…Two studies [79,81] identified sarcopenia using the diagnostic algorithm established by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) which defines sarcopenia as loss of function (either gait speed or grip strength) in the presence of low SMM or appendicular skeletal muscle (ASM) [4]. One study [82] assessed body composition using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) to derive ASM, calculated as the sum of lean soft tissue mass in both arms and legs [90] and further adjusted by BMI to establish the ASM index calculated using the formula, ASM/BMI [91,92]. Tyrovolas et al [85] however assessed ASM using a predictive equation proposed by Lee et al [93] to determine the ASM index.…”

Physical Frailty and Sarcopenia: Development of a Framework for Supporting Interventions Against Incident Mobility Disability

“…In fact, the FNIH recommendations were based on the results of ad hoc analyses conducted in multiple cohort databases of older persons. The adopted classification and regression tree models allowed the FNIH researchers to test a wide range of muscle variables, identify the best predictors of mobility disability, and propose sex-specific cut-points for discriminating between normal and pathological muscle aging 27) . The FNIH initiative recommended defining low muscle mass based on the ratio between appendicular lean mass (ALM) and body mass index or, alternatively, the crude ALM 26) .…”

Letter to the editor: results from a Web‐based survey to identify dynapenia screening tools and risk factors

“…There is increased focus on using muscle strength as an indicator of clinically relevant muscle weakness 1, 2. However, there is little information about how to efficiently screen patients who might have a risk of clinically significant muscle weakness.…”