2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutoff values for central obesity in Chinese based on mesenteric fat thickness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The different observations between our and other groups may result from changes in correlations of WC and %TF with increasing age [38]. Recently, data from Shanghai [39] and Hong Kong [40] indicated that the optimal WC cutoffs were 82 cm for abdominal obesity and 75 cm for mesenteric fat thickness among Chinese women, respectively. In this study, the WC cutoff was 80 cm for central obesity, which is similar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The different observations between our and other groups may result from changes in correlations of WC and %TF with increasing age [38]. Recently, data from Shanghai [39] and Hong Kong [40] indicated that the optimal WC cutoffs were 82 cm for abdominal obesity and 75 cm for mesenteric fat thickness among Chinese women, respectively. In this study, the WC cutoff was 80 cm for central obesity, which is similar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…20,21 Mesenteric adipose tissue inflammation plays a pathogenic role in NAFLD. First, the incidence of NAFLD dramatically increases as MAT thickens, 22,23 and Bergman et al suggest that MAT is a better predictor of insulin sensitivity than other depots of VAT. 7 Next, in inflamed MAT, the cytokines and lipid decomposition products drained to portal vein are elevated, promoting the damage of liver.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ko et al 20. determined that in a Chinese population, WC of 84.6 cm in men and 75.7 cm in women were the optimal cut‐off values to predict high mesenteric fat thickness with ROC analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%