2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2005.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cuticular hydrocarbon profiles and aggregation in four Periplaneta species (Insecta: Dictyoptera)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this selforganization does not exclude that the influence or attractiveness between individuals can differ by population. For example, as cuticular hydrocarbons act as aggregation pheromones [52], 'leader' individuals producing more cuticular hydrocarbons will act as key individuals [53] and contribute unintentionally more than others to the nucleation of aggregates and consequently to the collective decision. Indeed, it will influence 'followers' with lower attractiveness to stay longer under the 'leader' shelter.…”
Section: Discussion (A) Individual Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this selforganization does not exclude that the influence or attractiveness between individuals can differ by population. For example, as cuticular hydrocarbons act as aggregation pheromones [52], 'leader' individuals producing more cuticular hydrocarbons will act as key individuals [53] and contribute unintentionally more than others to the nucleation of aggregates and consequently to the collective decision. Indeed, it will influence 'followers' with lower attractiveness to stay longer under the 'leader' shelter.…”
Section: Discussion (A) Individual Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As proof of concept, the separation protocol was first tested with extracts of male and female American cockroaches, Periplaneta americana. The sexes have similar cuticular lipid profiles containing ∼25 compounds (35). Because the sexes could conceivably produce different stereoisomers of individual MBCHs, the CHCs of each sex were analyzed separately.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the groups had already made a collective decision before the first day of experiment. Hence, the model did not consider direct inter-attraction between individuals and only considered the exploratory behavior during the active phase and the settlement process during the resting phase, which is affected by hydrocarbon deposition (indirect inter-attraction)49. Indeed, the probability Ψ(NS, S) was greater than the Ψ(S, NS) for the UD condition, thus favoring the occupation of the S shelter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%