2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99181-8_116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cuteness Makes the Sale? How Consumer Responses are Affected by Message Framing and Crowding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The normative approach of this study to cuteness (from kindchenschema ) can also contribute to the understanding of potential negative effects (or ineffectiveness) of “cute marketing,” which is still believed to be a powerful tactic (e.g., Wang & Mukhopadhyay, 2016). As in some cases, the usage of cute marketing may create unintended meanings, backfiring the marketing efforts (e.g., Chang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normative approach of this study to cuteness (from kindchenschema ) can also contribute to the understanding of potential negative effects (or ineffectiveness) of “cute marketing,” which is still believed to be a powerful tactic (e.g., Wang & Mukhopadhyay, 2016). As in some cases, the usage of cute marketing may create unintended meanings, backfiring the marketing efforts (e.g., Chang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we used a scenario-based experimental approach because such an approach has been extensively used in appearance-based studies (Chang et al, 2018;Gorn et al, 2008;Yim et al, 2023). Scenario-based studies are also suitable because they are more robust than recall-based approaches or retrospective self-reports (Roggeveen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the marketing field, researchers have reported that when baby-faced employees interacted with customers, fewer online reviews were posted (Yim et al, 2023). Baby-faced sales agents also influence consumers to evaluate products positively, but not when messages have a promotional focus (Chang et al, 2018). Also, they were more able to influence older buyers (Bolman Pullins et al, 2011).…”
Section: Baby Face and Moral Charactermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recruited 159 participants on MTurk (39.4% female; M age = 35.55, SD age = 11.08), and participants were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions of the 2 (face type: babyface vs mature face) between-subjects design: babyface ( n = 78), mature face ( n = 81). Once participants viewed the image of a salesperson, we asked them to rate the level of a babyface on seven-point scales adapted from Chang et al (2018) [1 = not kind at all, 7 = very kind; 1 = not warm at all, 7 = very warm; 1 = not aggressive at all, 7 = very aggressive (reverse coded); 1 = not strong at all, 7 = very strong (reverse coded)] ( α = 0.55) [1]. We then reversed the reverse-coded items back when averaging the four items.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Face type. We adapted the salesperson's face type stimuli (babyface vs mature face) from Chang et al (2018). To ensure that the morphed images differed on the level of having a babyface, we conducted a pretest.…”
Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%