1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(85)70135-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutaneous reactions secondary to heparin injections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a thrombotic manifestation of the HIT syndrome and is characterized by the presence of platelet thrombi within the dermal microvasculature. It occurs in approximately 10-20% of patients with HIT antibodies and interestingly, as in this case, generally occurs in the absence of thrombocytopenia [2,3]. Other thrombotic manifestations such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and adrenal infarction are also seen in patients with heparin-induced skin necrosis [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…It is a thrombotic manifestation of the HIT syndrome and is characterized by the presence of platelet thrombi within the dermal microvasculature. It occurs in approximately 10-20% of patients with HIT antibodies and interestingly, as in this case, generally occurs in the absence of thrombocytopenia [2,3]. Other thrombotic manifestations such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and adrenal infarction are also seen in patients with heparin-induced skin necrosis [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…It is a thrombotic manifestation of the HIT syndrome and is characterized by the presence of platelet thrombi in the dermal microvasculature. It occurs in 10-20% of all patients with HIT antibodies, and generally in the absence of severe thrombocytopenia [4,5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although no prospective studies have been performed, this complication appears to be extremely rare, since only a limited number of cases of UFH-induced skin necrosis and seven cases (including our case) after LMWH have been reported. In addition, a number of cases of erythematous skin reactions after administration of UFH [9,10,21,23,24] and LMWH [9,10,13,18,21] have been described. In the seven cases of LMWH skin necrosis (Table 1) the lesion developed after about 1 week of treatment, starting with painful erythema and progressing within a short time to necrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%