2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40257-018-0400-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutaneous Adverse Effects of Diabetes Mellitus Medications and Medical Devices: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the past two decades, there has been an increased incidence of BP and an increased prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) among patients with BP. These findings aligns with the timing of approval and marketing of a new class of antihyperglycemic drugs, dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors [8][9][10]. The first DPP-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, was approved in 2006 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and thereafter saxagliptin, linagliptin, and alogliptin were approved in 2009, 2011, and 2013, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Within the past two decades, there has been an increased incidence of BP and an increased prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) among patients with BP. These findings aligns with the timing of approval and marketing of a new class of antihyperglycemic drugs, dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors [8][9][10]. The first DPP-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, was approved in 2006 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and thereafter saxagliptin, linagliptin, and alogliptin were approved in 2009, 2011, and 2013, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Allergic contact dermatitis and lipodystrophy (including lipohypertrophy) are among the most commonly reported cutaneous complications of both insulin pump and CGM use (Table 1). 4‐9 Also reports of atypical mycobacterial infections were found 10 . We highlight this case of a PG‐like neutrophilic and granulomatous response to increase awareness of a previously uncharacterized cutaneous adverse reaction at sites of insulin pump use.…”
Section: Case Narrativementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Some of this improvement could be explained by: titration of pump settings when initiating Omnipod, overcoming challenges that may be experienced with a tubed pump (e.g. insufficient insulin delivery due to air bubbles, kinking, or clogging of tubes [10]), fewer prolonged disconnections from the pump as it can be worn during swimming, showering, and exercise [39], or reduced lipohypertrophy stemming from more infusion site possibilities than with their prior tubed CSII device, enabled by the automatic cannula insertion [23,40,41]. It is also plausible that the multiple basal insulin rate settings, bolus calculator, and features such as extended bolus and temporary basal rate available with Omnipod allow for more responsive insulin delivery than simpler CSII models, which may only offer fixed basal and bolus amounts [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%