The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2006
DOI: 10.1002/zoo.20083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cut feather containing rachis as a sampling way for avian sexing

Abstract: Sex determination of birds is important to ensure successful breeding strategies, especially for endangered species. Most birds are vulnerable to stress during handling, however, so obtaining a sufficient amount of genomic DNA (gDNA) while causing the least amount of harm is a critical issue. Avian gender can be determined based on different CHD1 gene intron sizes in W and Z sex chromosomes. We have compared various specimen sources and have found that the rachis segment of a feather is a good DNA source for d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-invasive sampling methods for DNA extraction are necessary for birds of prey, since invasive sampling methods are stressful and require extensive handling of the birds that in turn has adverse effects on captive breeding programs (Taberlet, Waits, & Luikart, 1999). Various sources of genomic DNA have also been attempted for birds, including blood, muscle, feather bulb, oral swab, and feces (Bello, Francino, & Sanchez, 2001;Wang et al, 2006). However, feathers (either plucked or molted) seem to provide a more available and less stressful source of DNA than other sources in birds of prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-invasive sampling methods for DNA extraction are necessary for birds of prey, since invasive sampling methods are stressful and require extensive handling of the birds that in turn has adverse effects on captive breeding programs (Taberlet, Waits, & Luikart, 1999). Various sources of genomic DNA have also been attempted for birds, including blood, muscle, feather bulb, oral swab, and feces (Bello, Francino, & Sanchez, 2001;Wang et al, 2006). However, feathers (either plucked or molted) seem to provide a more available and less stressful source of DNA than other sources in birds of prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, currently, sex can be determined using molecular techniques (Griffiths et al, 1998;Bantock et al, 2008) which are often more accurate than biometric calculations. Molecular techniques show certain disadvantages with regard to biometric techniques, among which: a) they require more time to obtain accurate results, b) they are more expensive as a well equipped laboratory is required and expensive chemical compounds are needed, c) these are invasive techniques that often require blood or feathers from live birds, although sometimes a small portion of the rachis of a feather is enough (Wang et al, 2006). Molecular techniques have enabled to verify the validity of the biometric criteria previously used to determine sex.…”
Section: Sex Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%