2008
DOI: 10.3310/hta12020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

'Cut down to quit' with nicotine replacement therapies in smoking cessation: a systematic review of effectiveness and economic analysis

Abstract: Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For European countries the cost is £2 per monograph and for the rest of the world £3 per monograph.You can order HTA monographs from our Despatch Agents:-fax (with credit card or official purchase order) -post (with credit card or official purchase order or cheque) -phone during office hours (credit card only).Additionally the HTA website allows you either to pay securely by credit card or to print out your order and then post or fax it. NHS … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
91
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The NARS trials enrolled smokers who did not intend to quit imminently, and the primary goal was reduction. Somewhat unexpectedly, the treatment led to a doubling of long-term abstinence rates; hence, the NRT products tested were licensed for reducing to stop ( Wang et al, 2008 ). We speculate that the NRT improved the experience of reducing and eventually stopping smoking so that the smoker who felt unable to stop without NRT felt that it was possible with NRT, although the reason for the effi cacy of NRT in these trials is unknown.…”
Section: Assessing the Outcomes Of Prolonged Cessation-induction And mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The NARS trials enrolled smokers who did not intend to quit imminently, and the primary goal was reduction. Somewhat unexpectedly, the treatment led to a doubling of long-term abstinence rates; hence, the NRT products tested were licensed for reducing to stop ( Wang et al, 2008 ). We speculate that the NRT improved the experience of reducing and eventually stopping smoking so that the smoker who felt unable to stop without NRT felt that it was possible with NRT, although the reason for the effi cacy of NRT in these trials is unknown.…”
Section: Assessing the Outcomes Of Prolonged Cessation-induction And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems unlikely that participants recruited based on their not intending to stop smoking in the next month would begin a cessation attempt within 6 weeks of making such a statement. Consequently, such outcomes were rare (occurring in 1.6% of those in the NRT arm; Wang et al, 2008 ), and trials using this outcome as the primary one would need to be unfeasibly large to show a difference in abstinence between arms. These studies treated smokers for up to 18 months with a view to inducing abstinence throughout that period.…”
Section: Traditional Prolonged Abstinencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations