2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0066-782x2008001800003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Custos comparativos entre a revascularização miocárdica com e sem circulação extracorpórea

Abstract: SummaryBackground: Surgical techniques of myocardial revascularization without the use of extracorporeal circulation (ECC) have raised hopes of attaining operative results with less systemic damage, lower occurrence of clinical complications and shorter hospital stay duration, generating expectations of lower hospital costs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Forty-eight studies provided estimates on a coronary revascularization procedure – CABG, PCI, and a hybrid CABG–PCI procedure. Nearly half of the study estimates on revascularization were based on US populations (n=24; 48%); 9 , 10 , 13 , 81 102 the remainder came from eleven European (23%), 103 – 113 six Asian (13%), 114 – 119 three Latin American studies (6%), 120 122 and three multicountry RCTs (6%). 123 125 Hospital cohorts (n=19; 40%), claims analyses (n=14; 29%) and RCTs (n=10; 20%) were the predominant methodologies for revascularization estimates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forty-eight studies provided estimates on a coronary revascularization procedure – CABG, PCI, and a hybrid CABG–PCI procedure. Nearly half of the study estimates on revascularization were based on US populations (n=24; 48%); 9 , 10 , 13 , 81 102 the remainder came from eleven European (23%), 103 – 113 six Asian (13%), 114 – 119 three Latin American studies (6%), 120 122 and three multicountry RCTs (6%). 123 125 Hospital cohorts (n=19; 40%), claims analyses (n=14; 29%) and RCTs (n=10; 20%) were the predominant methodologies for revascularization estimates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, off-pump surgery has been demonstrated to reduce short-term costs of the procedure in 25% compared to the on-pump CABG, as well as it is cost-effective in the 5-years follow-up comparative analysis of the MASS-III trial. In our country, with severe health budget constraints, this savings could increase the ability to care for patients by one quarter [ 18 - 20 ] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have considered the values of fixed tables as costs based on Inpatient Hospital Authorization (IHA) or on prices of pre-established packages [ 4 , 12 ] . Others cited the transferred funds from SUS as a direct cost and additional institutional costs as indirect costs [ 13 ] , which may underestimate the real cost of the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%