Customized versus conventional video counseling for peritoneal dialysis decision-making in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease under a PD-first policy: a randomized controlled study

Parapiboon, Watanyu; Pitsawong, Wannapat; Wongluechai, Laddaporn; Thammavaranucupt, Kanin; Raegasint, Lalana

doi:10.23876/j.krcp.20.035

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We identified 41 EPs (excluding ten currently under investigation). Thirty-five were identified in peer-reviewed articles 71–104. Six were identified in meeting abstracts found in the grey literature 105–110…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 4 provides an overview of the studies71–86 88–118 that evaluated the identified EPs. Table S4 in online supplemental appendix 4 provides additional details on these studies.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table S4 in online supplemental appendix 4 provides additional details on these studies. The majority of these EPs (n=19, 47.5%) were evaluated in experimental studies (no.1, 3, 5, 7, 16, 19, 20, 22–27, 29, 35, 38–41), more than half of which (n=14, 73,7%) were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) 71 74 86 88 90–92 101–103 111–113 115. Less (n=16, 40.0%) were evaluated in observational studies (no.2, 4, 6, 11–15, 17, 18, 21, 28, 30–32, 34), a minority of which (n=4, 25.0%) were prospective cohort studies 76 94 95 117.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Shared decision-making in advanced kidney disease: a scoping review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesTo provide a comprehensive overview of interventions that support shared decision-making (SDM) for treatment modality decisions in advanced kidney disease (AKD). To provide summarised information on their content, use and reported results. To provide an overview of interventions currently under development or investigation.DesignThe JBI methodology for scoping reviews was followed. This review conforms to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist.Data sourcesMEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, PsycINFO, PROSPERO and Academic Search Premier for peer-reviewed literature. Other online databases (eg, clinicaltrials.gov, OpenGrey) for grey literature.Eligibility for inclusionRecords in English with a study population of patients >18 years of age with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Records had to be on the subject of SDM, or explicitly mention that the intervention reported on could be used to support SDM for treatment modality decisions in AKD.Data extraction and synthesisTwo reviewers independently screened and selected records for data extraction. Interventions were categorised as prognostic tools (PTs), educational programmes (EPs), patient decision aids (PtDAs) or multicomponent initiatives (MIs). Interventions were subsequently categorised based on the decisions they were developed to support.ResultsOne hundred forty-five interventions were identified in a total of 158 included records: 52 PTs, 51 EPs, 29 PtDAs and 13 MIs. Sixteen (n=16, 11%) were novel interventions currently under investigation. Forty-six (n=46, 35.7%) were reported to have been implemented in clinical practice. Sixty-seven (n=67, 51.9%) were evaluated for their effects on outcomes in the intended users.ConclusionThere is no conclusive evidence on which intervention is the most efficacious in supporting SDM for treatment modality decisions in AKD. There is a lot of variation in selected outcomes, and the body of evidence is largely based on observational research. In addition, the effects of these interventions on SDM are under-reported.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 4 provides an overview of the studies71–86 88–118 that evaluated the identified EPs. Table S4 in online supplemental appendix 4 provides additional details on these studies.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Shared decision-making in advanced kidney disease: a scoping review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this issue of Kidney Research and Clinical Practice , Watanyu et al [ 10 ] conducted an open-label controlled clinical trial comparing customized versus conventional video counseling on PD decision-making. For this clinical trial, they created video materials customized to the language environment, occupation and household income of individual patients.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient education and care for end-stage kidney disease: one size never fits all

2020

Kidney Res Clin Pract

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions

Jull

Köpke

Smith

et al. 2021

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundDecision coaching is non-directive support delivered by a healthcare provider to help patients prepare to actively participate in making a health decision. 'Healthcare providers' are considered to be all people who are engaged in actions whose primary intent is to protect and improve health (e.g. nurses, doctors, pharmacists, social workers, health support workers such as peer health workers).Little is known about the e ectiveness of decision coaching. ObjectivesTo determine the e ects of decision coaching (I) for people facing healthcare decisions for themselves or a family member (P) compared to (C) usual care or evidence-based intervention only, on outcomes (O) related to preparation for decision making, decisional needs and potential adverse e ects.

show abstract

Customized versus conventional video counseling for peritoneal dialysis decision-making in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease under a PD-first policy: a randomized controlled study

Cited by 3 publications

References 16 publications

Shared decision-making in advanced kidney disease: a scoping review

Shared decision-making in advanced kidney disease: a scoping review

Patient education and care for end-stage kidney disease: one size never fits all

Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About