2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.17.044005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Customized Quantum Annealing Schedules

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main routes to tackle this problem, in the unitary limit, is to engineer the annealing schedules as opposed to using the simple linear schedules. There have been many approaches to construct optimal schedules for the given problem in the recent past [58][59][60][61][62][63], and some of them [64] are based on genetic algorithms, that have been also fruitfully applied to the embedding problem [65][66][67][68][69] for QA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main routes to tackle this problem, in the unitary limit, is to engineer the annealing schedules as opposed to using the simple linear schedules. There have been many approaches to construct optimal schedules for the given problem in the recent past [58][59][60][61][62][63], and some of them [64] are based on genetic algorithms, that have been also fruitfully applied to the embedding problem [65][66][67][68][69] for QA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paradigmatic example of the quantum Ising chain, very studied today by its applicability in adiabatic quantum computing or quantum annealing [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], has such characteristics. Even though, its phenomenology has been largely elucidated over the years with the formulation of the Kibble-Zurek mechanism [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such truncations are common in numerical simulations of experimental systems of the type that our results are designed to be applied to, e.g. [ 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%