Customized-Language Voice Survey on Mobile Devices for Text and Image Data Collection Among Ethnic Groups in Thailand: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Abstract

BackgroundPublic health surveys are often conducted using paper-based questionnaires. However, many problems are associated with this method, especially when collecting data among ethnic groups who speak a different language from the survey interviewer. The process can be time-consuming and there is the risk of missing important data due to incomplete surveys.ObjectiveThis study was conducted as a proof-of-concept to develop a new electronic tool for data collection, and compare it with standard paper-based questionnaire surveys using the research setting of assessing Knowledge Attitude and Practice (KAP) toward the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) among 6 ethnic groups in Chiang Rai Province, Thailand. The two data collection methods were compared on data quality in terms of data completeness and time consumed in collecting the information. In addition, the initiative assessed the participants’ satisfaction toward the use of a smartphone customized-language voice-based questionnaire in terms of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness.MethodsFollowing a cross-over design, all study participants were interviewed using two data collection methods after a one-week washout period. Questions in the paper-based questionnaires in Thai language were translated to each ethnic language by the interviewer/translator when interviewing the study participant. The customized-language voice-based questionnaires were programmed to a smartphone tablet in six, selectable dialect languages and used by the trained interviewer when approaching participants.ResultsThe study revealed positive data quality outcomes when using the smartphone, voice-based questionnaire survey compared with the paper-based questionnaire survey, both in terms of data completeness and time consumed in data collection process. Since the smartphone questionnaire survey was programmed to ask questions in sequence, no data was missing and there were no entry errors. Participants had positive attitudes toward answering the smartphone questionnaire; 69% (48/70) reported they understood the questions easily, 71% (50/70) found it convenient, and 66% (46/70) reported a reduced time in data collection. The smartphone data collection method was acceptable by both the interviewers and by the study participants of different ethnicities.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study showing that the application of specific features of mobile devices like smartphone tablets (including dropdown choices, capturing pictures, and voiced questions) can be successfully used for data collection. The mobile device can be effectively used for capturing photos of secondary data and collecting primary data with customized-language and voiced questionnaire survey. Using smartphone questionnaires can minimize or eliminate missing data and reduce the time consumed during the data collection process. Smartphone customized-language, voice-based questionnaires for data collection can be an alternative and better approach than standard translated paper-based questionnaires...

Technologies for capturing and analysing animal health data in near real time

“…EMA has been successfully piloted in Uganda since 2013 with plans to expand its use across the country for tracking animal diseases, as well as additional pilot projects planned in other countries (38). Regardless of the platform, mobile apps have been well received when applied in animal health to remote data collection and have been shown to improve the timeliness of this collection as compared with paper-based questionnaires (2,8,27,32,39). While the current process for mobile app development is device-specific (i.e.…”

“…Additional capabilities continue to be developed that enhance the quality of data collection via mobile apps. For example, Jandee et al(32) developed a customised language voice survey within a mobile app. This development allows for questions to be read aloud in the local dialect, and demonstrates the enhanced quality of the data collected.Both online software platforms and custom-developed mobile apps are being used increasingly in animal health for near real-time data collection.…”

Sources of spatial animal and human health data: Casting the net wide to deal more effectively with increasingly complex disease problems

“…Additional benefits of mobile-based forms include the ability to customize voice-based questionnaires programmed into a smartphone or tablet computer which allows questions to be administered in local languages or dialects (Jandee et al, 2014) while programming the questionnaire to ask questions in sequence significantly reduces the risk of missing data. Similarly, the use of drop-down menus reduces the risk of data entry error (Jandee et al, 2014). Moreover, time spent completing smartphone-based questionnaire surveys is significantly less than when completing paper-based surveys (King et al, 2013;Anokwa et al, 2009;Jandee et al, 2014).…”

“…Similarly, the use of drop-down menus reduces the risk of data entry error (Jandee et al, 2014). Moreover, time spent completing smartphone-based questionnaire surveys is significantly less than when completing paper-based surveys (King et al, 2013;Anokwa et al, 2009;Jandee et al, 2014). However, as availability of open-source mobile software and tools increases -all differing with respect to accessibility, visualization and cost -choosing the most appropriate data-collection tool will depend largely on the type of data being collected (Madder et al, 2012).…”

Vaccination attitudes and mobile readiness: A survey of expectant and new mothers

“…Our sample size also limited the power of the study to detect associations between mobile usage and vaccination attitudes although it is consistent with other studies conducted to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability or efficacy of smartphone mediated interventions for health. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] However, our ability to detect associations was more limited by Figure 1. The distribution of participant mobile readiness scores (n D 54) calculated using the mean response to survey questions examining baseline mobile usage behavior outlined in Table 3.…”