2022
DOI: 10.19101/ijatee.2021.874862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Customized convolutional neural network to detect dental caries from radio visio graphy(RVG) images

Abstract: Dental caries, also known as tooth decay, is one of the extensive chronic diseases worldwide caused by the breakdown of tooth enamel [1]. Tooth decay causing bacteria in the mouth make acid that attacks tooth enamel, leading to a small hole in the tooth. Dental caries develops as a result of multiple interactions between acid-producing bacteria and fermentable carbohydrates, teeth, and saliva [2]. The mouth's correct and efficient care affects a person's general health and beauty. Oral diseases have to be trea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(to be continued on next page) (533/59/-) PAN 3 dentists (+10y) yes [77] (1250/-/125) PERI dentists (unspecified) yes [81] (3293/252/141) BTW 4 dentists (+3y) yes [82] (492/65/64) BTW 1 dentist + 1 radiologist (+9y) yes [15] (800/-/200) BTW 2 dentists (+10y) yes [83] photos + 120 x-rays * [57] Photos + X-Rays 2 dentists (+3y) yes [1] (1071/-/89) PAN 4 dentists (3-15y) yes [88] BTW 1 experienced dentist in oral radiology yes [38] PAN radiologists (unspecified) yes [34] (30/11/10) PAN 1 dentist + 1 radiologist yes [40] (447/127/61) PAN -yes [37] (485/69/139) PERI 2 dentists + 1 resident dentist yes [61] (80/-/20) PAN 2 dentists yes [84] (400/50/50) BTW 1 radiologist (11y) and a research assistant (3y) yes [62] (1200/150/150) PAN Clinicians (unspecified) yes [85] (935/117/117) PERI 1 radiologist (12y) and a research assistant (2y) yes [51] (76/-/32) PAN 3 dentists (+3y) yes [52] (980/-/420) PAN 3 dentists (+3y) yes [63] (90/-/10) PAN Radiologists (unspecified, +5y) yes [53] (1104/111/121) RVG Dentists (unspecified) yes [89] (175/-/75) PAN Dentists (unspecified, +5y) yes [87] (457/-/195) Unspecified 4 dentists yes [78] (193/83/1224) PAN -no [66] (2507/835/835) PAN 1 dentist + 1 dental student (last year) yes [79] PANs + 682 PERI/BTW * [3] PAN + PERI + BTW 3 dentists yes [86] PAN dentists (unspecified) yes [35] (1005/335/335) BTW 2 dentists yes [80] (1000/0/200) BTW Dentists (unspecified) no [41] ( (iii) number and expertise of professionals involved in the annotation task and (iv) whether the paper presents any information about the dataset annotation protocol. This information is used to investigate RQ1 Concerning RQ1.1, the selected papers exploited three different types of radiograph: panoramic (forty-six papers, 66.67%), periapical (nine papers, 13.04%), and bitewing (eight papers, 11.59%).…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(to be continued on next page) (533/59/-) PAN 3 dentists (+10y) yes [77] (1250/-/125) PERI dentists (unspecified) yes [81] (3293/252/141) BTW 4 dentists (+3y) yes [82] (492/65/64) BTW 1 dentist + 1 radiologist (+9y) yes [15] (800/-/200) BTW 2 dentists (+10y) yes [83] photos + 120 x-rays * [57] Photos + X-Rays 2 dentists (+3y) yes [1] (1071/-/89) PAN 4 dentists (3-15y) yes [88] BTW 1 experienced dentist in oral radiology yes [38] PAN radiologists (unspecified) yes [34] (30/11/10) PAN 1 dentist + 1 radiologist yes [40] (447/127/61) PAN -yes [37] (485/69/139) PERI 2 dentists + 1 resident dentist yes [61] (80/-/20) PAN 2 dentists yes [84] (400/50/50) BTW 1 radiologist (11y) and a research assistant (3y) yes [62] (1200/150/150) PAN Clinicians (unspecified) yes [85] (935/117/117) PERI 1 radiologist (12y) and a research assistant (2y) yes [51] (76/-/32) PAN 3 dentists (+3y) yes [52] (980/-/420) PAN 3 dentists (+3y) yes [63] (90/-/10) PAN Radiologists (unspecified, +5y) yes [53] (1104/111/121) RVG Dentists (unspecified) yes [89] (175/-/75) PAN Dentists (unspecified, +5y) yes [87] (457/-/195) Unspecified 4 dentists yes [78] (193/83/1224) PAN -no [66] (2507/835/835) PAN 1 dentist + 1 dental student (last year) yes [79] PANs + 682 PERI/BTW * [3] PAN + PERI + BTW 3 dentists yes [86] PAN dentists (unspecified) yes [35] (1005/335/335) BTW 2 dentists yes [80] (1000/0/200) BTW Dentists (unspecified) no [41] ( (iii) number and expertise of professionals involved in the annotation task and (iv) whether the paper presents any information about the dataset annotation protocol. This information is used to investigate RQ1 Concerning RQ1.1, the selected papers exploited three different types of radiograph: panoramic (forty-six papers, 66.67%), periapical (nine papers, 13.04%), and bitewing (eight papers, 11.59%).…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is used to investigate RQ1 Concerning RQ1.1, the selected papers exploited three different types of radiograph: panoramic (forty-six papers, 66.67%), periapical (nine papers, 13.04%), and bitewing (eight papers, 11.59%). One study (1.45%) combined panoramic and periapical [45], another combined periapical and bitewing [74], another combined panomaric, periapical and bitewing [79], another used RadioVisioGraphy (RVG) [53] and another manipulated panoramic and high-definition photographs of the mouth [83]. One article did not specify the type of radiograph [87].…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%