2008
DOI: 10.1002/uog.5372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Customized birth weight: coefficients and validation of models in a UK population

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study has demonstrated that by selecting a normal population, the median and SD of birthweight for GA and the effects of certain maternal characteristics are similar to those estimated in previous studies which combined data from normal pregnancies at term with ultrasonographically derived fetal growth charts [1,2,3]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our study has demonstrated that by selecting a normal population, the median and SD of birthweight for GA and the effects of certain maternal characteristics are similar to those estimated in previous studies which combined data from normal pregnancies at term with ultrasonographically derived fetal growth charts [1,2,3]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The association between these maternal and pregnancy conditions with abnormal fetal growth is well described [12,13,14,15], and in previous studies reporting on normal ranges these conditions have also been excluded [1,2,3]. This is particularly important for early gestations because a high proportion of pregnancies resulting in preterm birth are pathological.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8,12,20 However, large population-derived coefficients have previously demonstrated that birth weight is similarly influenced by maternal ethnicity, age, parity, BMI, gestational age and fetal gender, with females weighing, on average, 120-200 grams less than male infants. 30 For the study reported herein, subjects were matched in a nested cohort design by virtue of maternal age (±1 year), race/ethnicity, BMI and gestational age (±1 week), but without regard to infant outcome, including birth weight and gender. Thus, it remained a formal possibility that unmatched potential confounders of birth weight (i.e., fetal gender) could similarly be in association with an altered placental methylome and be misattributed to an effect of smoking.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was needed because, although maternal smoking is associated with a significant decrease in fetal birth weight and renders risk of SGA birth across maternal strata, 8,12,20,28 large population-derived studies have also shown that female infants weigh on-average 120 to 200 grams less than males. 30 After Bonferroni correction, the variation of methylation level at 6 CpG sites in female newborn samples could be explained by smoking status to infant weight interactions, revealing that as few as 6 essential sites in the placental methylome are modified in association with maternal smoking to significantly influence birth weight. Others 29 have similarly employed integrated computational and multivariate analysis approaches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%